Weed Suppression in Only-Legume Cover Crop Mixtures

被引:21
|
作者
Elsalahy, Heba [1 ,2 ]
Doering, Thomas [3 ]
Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko [1 ,4 ]
Arends, Danny [5 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agron & Crop Sci, Albrecht Thaer Weg 5, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Sci, Bot & Microbiol Dept, Assiut 71516, Egypt
[3] Univ Bonn, Agroecol & Organ Farming Grp, Hugel 6, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
[4] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Res Area Land Use & Governance, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst Agr & Hort Sci, Anim Breeding Biol & Mol Genet, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
asynchrony; crop diversification; forage legume; functional traits; interspecific interaction; mixed cropping; weed control; SPECIES EVENNESS; PLANT DIVERSITY; LIVING MULCHES; INTERCROPS; INVASION; YIELD; PRODUCTIVITY; DENSITY; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy9100648
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weed suppression is a potential benefit of cover crop mixtures, as species diversity may allow for combining early and late-season competition with weeds. Here, we studied if this is possible for only-legume mixtures containing species with different growth rates, by testing two legumes, alsike clover (AC; Trifolium hybridum L.) and black medic (BM; Medicago lupulina L.) in two field trials sown in 2016 and 2017. Five AC:BM ratios (100:0, 67:33, 50:50, 33:67, and 0:100) were grown at three densities (50%, 100%, and 150% of recommended seed density). Cover crop and weed aboveground biomass (CCB and WB, respectively) were harvested three times, after establishment in spring (H1), in summer (H2), and in autumn after mulching (H3). Compared to fallow plots, all monocultures and mixtures showed early-season weed suppression in terms of biomass production and more efficiency over time with an average reduction of 42%, 52%, and 96% in 2016, and 39%, 55%, and 89% in 2017 at H1, H2, and H3, respectively. Out of 54 mixture treatments, only eight mixtures showed stronger weed suppression than monocultures. Mixtures reduced WB by 28%, as an average value, in 2017 compared to the respective monocultures, but not significantly in 2016, indicating that the crop diversity effect on weeds was dependent on the growing environment. Weed suppression was significantly higher at 100% and 150% seed density than 50%, but no significant differences were determined between 100% and 150% seed density. After mulching, no density effect was observed on CCB and WB. In conclusion, AC and BM can be used as a keystone species on weed suppression for sustainable agriculture as they possess plasticity to suppress weeds when higher biomass productivity is limited by environmental conditions. However, their diversity effects are time and condition dependent. Appropriate seed density and mulching can successfully be employed in weed management, but seed density may not have an effect after mulching.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Weed Suppression in Cover Crop Monocultures and Mixtures
    Baraibar, Barbara
    Hunter, Mitchell C.
    Schipanski, Meagan E.
    Hamilton, Abbe
    Mortensen, David A.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2018, 66 (01) : 121 - 133
  • [2] Grass-Legume Cover Crop Mixtures and Manure Affect Weed Seed Production and Legume Nodulation
    Brainard, Daniel
    Bellinder, Robin R.
    Kumar, Virender
    HORTSCIENCE, 2009, 44 (04) : 1065 - 1066
  • [3] Reduced canopy cover and development compromises weed suppression by buckwheat in cover crop mixtures
    Worthing, Maya
    Mills, Aaron
    McKenzie-Gopsill, Andrew
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2025, 105
  • [4] Reduced canopy cover and development compromises weed suppression by buckwheat in cover crop mixtures
    Worthing, Maya
    Mills, Aaron
    McKenzie-Gopsill, Andrew
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2025, 105
  • [5] Weed suppression in cover crop mixtures under contrasted levels of resource availability
    Rouge, Alicia
    Adeux, Guillaume
    Busset, Hugues
    Hugard, Rodolphe
    Martin, Juliette
    Matejicek, Annick
    Moreau, Delphine
    Guillemin, Jean-Philippe
    Cordeau, Stephane
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2022, 136
  • [6] Winter Annual Weed Suppression in Rye-Vetch Cover Crop Mixtures
    Hayden, Zachary D.
    Brainard, Daniel C.
    Henshaw, Ben
    Ngouajio, Mathieu
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (04) : 818 - 825
  • [7] Species-Specific Contributions to Productivity and Weed Suppression in Cover Crop Mixtures
    Holmes, Ashley A.
    Thompson, Ashley A.
    Wortman, Sam E.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2017, 109 (06) : 2808 - 2819
  • [8] Assessing the Efficacy of Living and Dead Cover Crop Mixtures for Weed Suppression in Sweet Corn
    Yurchak, Veronica L.
    Leslie, Alan W.
    Hooks, Cerruti R. R.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [9] Grass-Legume Mixtures and Soil Fertility Affect Cover Crop Performance and Weed Seed Production
    Brainard, Daniel C.
    Bellinder, Robin R.
    Kumar, Virender
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 25 (03) : 473 - 479
  • [10] Effects of paraquat application at cover crop planting on cover crop biomass and weed suppression
    Sias, Cynthia
    Bamber, Kevin W.
    Kumar, Vipin
    Singh, Vijay
    Flessner, Michael L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 37 (05) : 494 - 499