Weed Suppression in Only-Legume Cover Crop Mixtures

被引:21
|
作者
Elsalahy, Heba [1 ,2 ]
Doering, Thomas [3 ]
Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko [1 ,4 ]
Arends, Danny [5 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agron & Crop Sci, Albrecht Thaer Weg 5, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Sci, Bot & Microbiol Dept, Assiut 71516, Egypt
[3] Univ Bonn, Agroecol & Organ Farming Grp, Hugel 6, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
[4] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Res Area Land Use & Governance, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst Agr & Hort Sci, Anim Breeding Biol & Mol Genet, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
asynchrony; crop diversification; forage legume; functional traits; interspecific interaction; mixed cropping; weed control; SPECIES EVENNESS; PLANT DIVERSITY; LIVING MULCHES; INTERCROPS; INVASION; YIELD; PRODUCTIVITY; DENSITY; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy9100648
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weed suppression is a potential benefit of cover crop mixtures, as species diversity may allow for combining early and late-season competition with weeds. Here, we studied if this is possible for only-legume mixtures containing species with different growth rates, by testing two legumes, alsike clover (AC; Trifolium hybridum L.) and black medic (BM; Medicago lupulina L.) in two field trials sown in 2016 and 2017. Five AC:BM ratios (100:0, 67:33, 50:50, 33:67, and 0:100) were grown at three densities (50%, 100%, and 150% of recommended seed density). Cover crop and weed aboveground biomass (CCB and WB, respectively) were harvested three times, after establishment in spring (H1), in summer (H2), and in autumn after mulching (H3). Compared to fallow plots, all monocultures and mixtures showed early-season weed suppression in terms of biomass production and more efficiency over time with an average reduction of 42%, 52%, and 96% in 2016, and 39%, 55%, and 89% in 2017 at H1, H2, and H3, respectively. Out of 54 mixture treatments, only eight mixtures showed stronger weed suppression than monocultures. Mixtures reduced WB by 28%, as an average value, in 2017 compared to the respective monocultures, but not significantly in 2016, indicating that the crop diversity effect on weeds was dependent on the growing environment. Weed suppression was significantly higher at 100% and 150% seed density than 50%, but no significant differences were determined between 100% and 150% seed density. After mulching, no density effect was observed on CCB and WB. In conclusion, AC and BM can be used as a keystone species on weed suppression for sustainable agriculture as they possess plasticity to suppress weeds when higher biomass productivity is limited by environmental conditions. However, their diversity effects are time and condition dependent. Appropriate seed density and mulching can successfully be employed in weed management, but seed density may not have an effect after mulching.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Weed Suppression in Cover Crop Monocultures and Mixtures
    Baraibar, Barbara
    Hunter, Mitchell C.
    Schipanski, Meagan E.
    Hamilton, Abbe
    Mortensen, David A.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2018, 66 (01) : 121 - 133
  • [2] Weed suppression in cover crop mixtures under contrasted levels of resource availability
    Rouge, Alicia
    Adeux, Guillaume
    Busset, Hugues
    Hugard, Rodolphe
    Martin, Juliette
    Matejicek, Annick
    Moreau, Delphine
    Guillemin, Jean-Philippe
    Cordeau, Stephane
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2022, 136
  • [3] Winter Annual Weed Suppression in Rye-Vetch Cover Crop Mixtures
    Hayden, Zachary D.
    Brainard, Daniel C.
    Henshaw, Ben
    Ngouajio, Mathieu
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (04) : 818 - 825
  • [4] Cover crop mixture diversity, biomass productivity, weed suppression, and stability
    Florence, A. M.
    Higley, L. G.
    Drijber, R. A.
    Francis, C. A.
    Lindquist, J. L.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [5] Seeding Rate and Planting Arrangement Effects on Growth and Weed Suppression of a Legume-Oat Cover Crop for Organic Vegetable Systems
    Brennan, Eric B.
    Boyd, Nathan S.
    Smith, Richard F.
    Foster, Phil
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2009, 101 (04) : 979 - 988
  • [6] Improving dual cover crop mixtures to increase shoot biomass production and weed suppression potential
    Gross, Jonas
    Kuemmerer, Robin
    Heuermann, Diana
    Gentsch, Norman
    Schweneker, Doerte
    Feuerstein, Ulf
    Guggenberger, Georg
    von Wiren, Nicolaus
    Bauer, Bernhard
    FRONTIERS IN AGRONOMY, 2024, 6
  • [7] Functional diversity of cover crop mixtures enhances biomass yield and weed suppression in a Mediterranean agroecosystem
    Ranaldo, M.
    Carlesi, S.
    Costanzo, A.
    Barberi, P.
    WEED RESEARCH, 2020, 60 (01) : 96 - 108
  • [8] Species-Specific Contributions to Productivity and Weed Suppression in Cover Crop Mixtures
    Holmes, Ashley A.
    Thompson, Ashley A.
    Wortman, Sam E.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2017, 109 (06) : 2808 - 2819
  • [9] Weed suppression and maize yield influenced by cover crop mixture diversity and tillage
    Leskovsek, Robert
    Eler, Klemen
    Zamljen, Sergeja Adamic
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 383
  • [10] Assessing the Efficacy of Living and Dead Cover Crop Mixtures for Weed Suppression in Sweet Corn
    Yurchak, Veronica L.
    Leslie, Alan W.
    Hooks, Cerruti R. R.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):