To transport or to terminate resuscitation on-site. What factors influence EMS decisions in patients without ROSC? A mixed-methods study

被引:16
作者
de Graaf, Corina [1 ]
de Kruif, Anja J. Th. C. M. [2 ]
Beesems, Stefanie G. [1 ]
Koster, Rudolph W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr AMC, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
OHCA; ROSC; Decision-making; Transport practices; HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; COUNCIL GUIDELINES; EXPERIENCES; OUTCOMES; ASSOCIATION; PARAMEDICS; SCENARIOS; SURVIVAL; DURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.005
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: If a patient in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) does not achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) despite advanced life support, emergency medical services can decide to either transport the patient with ongoing CPR or terminate resuscitation on scene. Purpose: To determine differences between patients without ROSC to be transported vs. terminated on scene and explore medical and nonmedical factors that contribute to the decision-making of paramedics on scene. Methods: Mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data on all-cause OHCA patients without ROSC on scene, between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016, in the Amsterdam Resuscitation Study database, were analyzed to find factors associated with decision to transport. Qualitative data was collected by performing 16 semi-structured interviews with paramedics from the study region, transcribed and coded to identify themes regarding OHCA decision-making on the scene. Results: In the quantitative Utstein dataset, of 5870 OHCA patients, 3190 (54%) patients did not achieve ROSC on scene. In a multivariable model, age (OR 0.98), public location (OR 2.70), bystander witnessed (OR 1.65), EMS witnessed (OR 9.03), and first rhythm VF/VT (OR 11.22) or PEA (OR 2.34), were independently associated with transport with ongoing CPR. The proportion of variance explained by the model was only 0.36. With the qualitative method, four main themes were identified: patient-related factors, local circumstances, paramedic-related factors, and the structure of the organization. Conclusion: In patients without ROSC on scene, besides known resuscitation characteristics, the decision to transport a patient is largely determined by non-protocollized factors.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 92
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Commence, continue, withhold or terminate?: a systematic review of decision-making in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Anderson, Natalie E.
    Gott, Merryn
    Slark, Julia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 24 (02) : 80 - 86
  • [2] Grey areas: New Zealand ambulance personnel's experiences of challenging resuscitation decision-making
    Anderson, Natalie Elizabeth
    Gott, Merryn
    Slark, Julia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2018, 39 : 62 - 67
  • [3] Comorbidity and favorable neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients of 70 years and older
    Beesems, Stefanie G.
    Blom, Marieke T.
    van der Pas, Martine H. A.
    Hulleman, Michiel
    van de Glind, Esther M. M.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Tan, Hanno L.
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    Koster, Rudolph W.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2015, 94 : 33 - 39
  • [4] Improved Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Use of Automated External Defibrillators
    Blom, Marieke T.
    Beesems, Stefanie G.
    Homma, Petronella C. M.
    Zijlstra, Jolande A.
    Hulleman, Michiel
    van Hoeijen, Daniel A.
    Bardai, Abdennasser
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Tan, Hanno L.
    Koster, Rudolph W.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2014, 130 (21) : 1868 - +
  • [5] Managing stress in prehospital care: Strategies used by ambulance nurses
    Bohstrom, Dan
    Carlstrom, Eric
    Sjostrom, Nils
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2017, 32 : 28 - 33
  • [6] European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 11. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions
    Bossaert, Leo L.
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    Askitopoulou, Helen
    Raffay, Violetta I.
    Greif, Robert
    Haywood, Kirstie L.
    Mentzelopoulos, Spyros D.
    Nolan, Jerry P.
    Van de Voorde, Patrick
    Xanthos, Theodoros T.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2015, 95 : 302 - 311
  • [7] Emergency medical service provider decision-making in out of hospital cardiac arrest: an exploratory study
    Brandling, J.
    Kirby, K.
    Black, S.
    Voss, S.
    Benger, J.
    [J]. BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 17
  • [8] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [9] Time of on-scene resuscitation in out of-hospital cardiac arrest patients transported without return of spontaneous circulation
    de Graaf, Corina
    Beesems, Stefanie G.
    Koster, Rudolph W.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2019, 138 : 235 - 242
  • [10] Fox Julia, 2013, Acute Card Care, V15, P1, DOI 10.3109/17482941.2012.735675