Exploring grade levels and gender differences in Numeracy Thinking among secondary school students.

被引:4
作者
Ameer, Ilda Salwani [1 ]
Singh, Parmjit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Educ, Shah Alam 40200, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNIVERSITY LEARNING AND TEACHING (INCULT 2012) | 2013年 / 90卷
关键词
Numeracy; Numeracy thinking; grade levels; gender differences; GIRLS; BOYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.081
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Numeracy becomes important in the Malaysian context, when the Prime Minister lit the switch on Numeracy and emphasized its salience in the 10th Malaysia Plan as the foundation to build the first world talent base and the realization of Vision 2020. Taking this as the cue, this study was initiated to explore the grade levels (Form 1, Form 2 and Form 4) and gender differences in Numeracy thinking among secondary school students. This is a descriptive correlation design using stratified purposive random sampling where a total of 414 students, aged 12-16 years old, from six schools participated in this study. All these students had obtained an A grade in their Mathematics examination. The instrument used was the Numeracy Test to assess their Numeracy thinking. The finding revealed that there was a significant difference in the Numeracy performance between the grade levels. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the results between students in Form 2 and Form 4. This seems to suggest that very little Numeracy development occurred among the Form 4 students as they went through Mathematics learning from Form 2 to Form 4. The overall students performance was low (mean=36.99 (max =66), SD=7.56) taking into consideration that these students had obtained an A grade in their examination. This finding is a damning indictment of the examination orientated education and raises questions about the validity of National examination results of Mathematics grades. The finding on gender analysis indicated that female students were outperformed by their male counterparts in the Numeracy assessment across all levels and these differences were statistically significant. Considering these differences, one must ask oneself the salient question: "Is our education system catering the need of both gender and are we giving the right emphasis?" This is a seminal point that should be pondered upon. It is recommended that further research about gender-specific education should be undertaken to analyse these situations. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Faculty of Education, University Technology MARA, Malaysia.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 195
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Agarwal K. P., 1992, DEVELOPMENT OF CREAT
  • [2] [Anonymous], HOW THE BRAIN LEARNS
  • [3] Bana J., 2004, PAPER PRESENTED AT 2
  • [4] Charngeet K., 2000, THESIS
  • [5] Hamid Siti Rafiah Abdul, 2008, THESIS
  • [6] Kennedy L.M., 2000, Guiding Children's Learning of Mathematics
  • [7] Mathematical thinking of kindergarten boys and girls: similar achievement, different contributing processes
    Klein, Pnina S.
    Adi-Japha, Esther
    Hakak-Benizri, Simcha
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS, 2010, 73 (03) : 233 - 246
  • [8] Lau N. K., 2008, IMPROVING TEACHING A, P109
  • [9] Developmental Trends of Creativity: What Twists of Turn Do Boys and Girls Take at Different Grades?
    Lau, Sing
    Cheung, Ping Chung
    [J]. CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 22 (03) : 329 - 336
  • [10] Levi Linda., 2000, TEACHING CHILDREN MA, V7, P101