A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples

被引:286
作者
Smith, Scott M. [1 ]
Roster, Catherine A. [2 ]
Golden, Linda L. [3 ]
Albaum, Gerald S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Consumer panels; Respondents; Data quality; Mechanical Turk; Internet surveys; Survey research; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the exploding use of Internet surveys, research efforts and data quality are increasingly subject to the effects of respondents who do not give the required attention to survey questions and who speed through the survey, or who intentionally cheat with their answers. We investigate respondent integrity and data quality for samples drawn from a "Regular" online panel and from Amazon's MTurk. New metrics for assessing sample integrity and online data quality are introduced. Overall, MTurk respondents in both respondent groups took less time to answer questions. The non-USA MTurk group deviated most from correct answers in attention filter questions and had more duplicate IP addresses. In addition, the results from the three Internet sample sources are substantively different The choice of an Internet survey sample vendor is critical, as it can impact sample composition, respondent integrity, data quality, data structure and substantive results. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:3139 / 3148
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Role of response behavior theory in survey research: A cross-national study
    Albaum, GS
    Evangelista, F
    Medina, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1998, 42 (02) : 115 - 125
  • [2] [Anonymous], 15 BIENN WORLD MARK
  • [3] Research Synthesis
    Baker, Reg
    Blumberg, Stephen J.
    Brick, J. Michael
    Couper, Mick P.
    Courtright, Melanie
    Dennis, J. Michael
    Dillman, Don
    Frankel, Martin R.
    Garland, Philip
    Groves, Robert M.
    Kennedy, Courtney
    Krosnick, Jon
    Lavrakas, Paul J.
    Lee, Sunghee
    Link, Michael
    Piekarski, Linda
    Rao, Kumar
    Thomas, Randall K.
    Zahs, Dan
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2010, 74 (04) : 711 - 781
  • [4] A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys
    Braunsberger, Karin
    Wybenga, Hans
    Gates, Roger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2007, 60 (07) : 758 - 764
  • [5] The Future of Survey Sampling
    Brick, J. Michael
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2011, 75 (05) : 872 - 888
  • [6] Bruggen E., 2005, WORLD MARK C
  • [7] Individual differences in motivation to participate in online panels The effect on response rate and response quality perceptions
    Bruggen, Elisabeth
    Wetzels, Martin
    de Ruyter, Ko
    Schillewaert, Niels
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2011, 53 (03) : 369 - 390
  • [8] Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
    Buhrmester, Michael
    Kwang, Tracy
    Gosling, Samuel D.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [9] Callegaro M, 2014, WILEY SER SURV METH, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118763520
  • [10] Comley P., 2005, WORLDWIDE PANEL RES, P409