Towards a Usability Scale for Participatory GIS

被引:11
作者
Ballatore, Andrea [1 ]
McClintock, Will [2 ]
Goldberg, Grace [2 ]
Kuhn, Werner [3 ]
机构
[1] Birkbeck Univ London, Dept Geog, London, England
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Geog, Ctr Spatial Studies, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
来源
GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT | 2020年
关键词
Participatory GIS; PGIS; Participatory GIS Usability Scale (PGUS); Usability evaluation; User experience; Web mapping; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-14745-7_18
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Since its emergence in the 1990s, the area of Participatory GIS (PGIS) has generated numerous interactive mapping tools to support complex planning processes. The need to involve non-expert users makes the usability of these tools a crucial aspect that contributes to their success or failure. While many approaches and procedures have been proposed to assess usability in general, to date there is no standardized way to measure the overall usability of a PGIS. For this purpose, we introduce the Participatory GIS Usability Scale (PGUS), a questionnaire to evaluate the usability of a PGIS along five dimensions (user interface, spatial interface, learnability, effectiveness, and communication). The questionnaire was developed in collaboration with the user community of SeaSketch, a web-based platform for marine spatial planning. PGUS quantifies the subjective perception of usability on a scale between 0 and 100, facilitating the rapid evaluation and comparison between PGIS. As a case study, the PGUS was used to collect feedback from 175 SeaSketch users, highlighting the usability strengths and weaknesses of the platform.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 348
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Participating in Rural Appraisal? A Review of Participatory GIS and Citizen Science Approaches
    Ntassiou, Konstantina
    GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2025, 19 (03):
  • [42] Usability evaluation from client-side traces using heatmap and system usability scale
    Rezaiguia, Houcem
    Djeffal, Abdelhamid
    2022 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INNOVATIVE INFORMATICS OF BISKRA, ISNIB, 2022, : 88 - 93
  • [43] Towards a Revised Framework for Participatory Planning in the Context of Risk
    Rizzi, Paola
    Porebska, Anna
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [44] Towards evaluation criteria in participatory flood risk management
    Maskrey, S. A.
    Priest, S.
    Mount, N. J.
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (02):
  • [45] European Portuguese validation of the System Usability Scale (SUS)
    Martins, Ana Isabel
    Rosa, Ana Filipa
    Queiros, Alexandra
    Silva, Anabela
    Rocha, Nelson Pacheco
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENHANCING ACCESSIBILITY AND FIGHTING INFO-EXCLUSION, 2015, 67 : 293 - 300
  • [46] The Development of Geographic Information System using Participatory GIS Concept of Spatial Management
    Radliya, Nizar Rabbi
    Fauzan, Rauf
    Irmayanti, Hani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 10 (01) : 411 - 417
  • [47] Participatory GIS in a sustainable use reserve in Brazilian Amazonia: Implications for management and conservation
    Bernard, Enrico
    Barbosa, Luis
    Carvalho, Raquel
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 31 (02) : 564 - 572
  • [48] User attitude towards novel biometric system and usability analysis
    Bhardwaj, Ishan
    Londhe, Narendra D.
    Kopparapu, Sunil K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETRICS, 2018, 10 (03) : 214 - 231
  • [49] The Commercialisation of Public Data - How Does Participatory Data-mining Look on a Global Scale?
    Panek, Jiri
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS, 2013, 2 (03): : 231 - 245
  • [50] Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good
    Bondi, Elizabeth
    Xu, Lily
    Acosta-Navas, Diana
    Killian, Jackson A.
    AIES '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, 2021, : 425 - 436