Prediction of Left Ventricular Mechanics Using Machine Learning

被引:49
作者
Dabiri, Yaghoub [1 ,2 ]
Van der Velden, Alex [3 ]
Sack, Kevin L. [2 ,4 ]
Choy, Jenny S. [1 ]
Kassab, Ghassan S. [1 ]
Guccione, Julius M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif Med Innovat Inst, San Diego, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] SIMULIA, Dassault Syst, Johnston, IA USA
[4] Univ Cape Town, Dept Human Biol, Div Biomed Engn, Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
left ventricle; machine learning; finite element method; XGBoost; Cubist; HEART-FAILURE; REGRESSION; INJECTION; ELEMENT; IMPACT; WALL;
D O I
10.3389/fphy.2019.00117
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The goal of this paper was to provide a real-time left ventricular (LV) mechanics simulator using machine learning (ML). Finite element (FE) simulations were conducted for the LV with different material properties to obtain a training set. A hyperelastic fiber-reinforced material model was used to describe the passive behavior of the myocardium during diastole. The active behavior of the heart resulting from myofiber contractions was added to the passive tissue during systole. The active and passive properties govern the LV constitutive equation. These mechanical properties were altered using optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments to obtain training FE models with varied active properties (volume and pressure predictions) and varied passive properties (stress predictions). For prediction of LV pressures, we used eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) and Cubist, and XGBoost was used for predictions of LV pressures, volumes as well as LV stresses. The LV pressure and volume results obtained from ML were similar to FE computations. The ML results could capture the shape of LV pressure as well as LV pressure-volume loops. The results predicted by Cubist were smoother than those from XGBoost. The mean absolute errors were as follows: XGBoost volume: 1.734 +/- 0.584 ml, XGBoost pressure: 1.544 +/- 0.298 mmHg, Cubist volume: 1.495 +/- 0.260 ml, Cubist pressure: 1.623 +/- 0.191 mmHg, myofiber stress: 0.334 +/- 0.228 kPa, cross myofiber stress: 0.075 +/- 0.024 kPa, and shear stress: 0.050 +/- 0.032 kPa. The simulation results show ML can predict LV mechanics much faster than the FE method. The ML model can be used as a tool to predict LV behavior. Training of our ML model based on a large group of subjects can improve its predictability for real world applications.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Partial LVAD restores ventricular outputs and normalizes LV but not RV stress distributions in the acutely failing heart in silico [J].
Sack, Kevin L. ;
Baillargeon, Brian ;
Acevedo-Bolton, Gabriel ;
Genet, Martin ;
Rebelo, Nuno ;
Kuhl, Ellen ;
Klein, Liviu ;
Weiselthaler, Georg M. ;
Burkhoff, Daniel ;
Franz, Thomas ;
Guccione, Julius M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2016, 39 (08) :421-430
[32]   Phenotypic and pathophysiological heterogeneity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [J].
Shah, Amil M. ;
Solomon, Scott D. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (14) :1716-+
[33]  
Shewry M. C., 1987, J. Appl. Stat., V14, P165
[34]   A machine learning approach to the accurate prediction of monitor units for a compact proton machine [J].
Sun, Baozhou ;
Lam, Dao ;
Yang, Deshan ;
Grantham, Kevin ;
Zhang, Tiezhi ;
Mutic, Sasa ;
Zhao, Tianyu .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (05) :2243-2251
[35]  
Van der Velden A., 2018, DISCIPLINARY CONVERG, P327, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_23
[36]   Theoretical impact of the injection of material into the myocardium - A finite element model simulation [J].
Wall, Samuel T. ;
Walker, Joseph C. ;
Healy, Kevin E. ;
Ratcliffe, Mark B. ;
Guccione, Julius M. .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (24) :2627-2635
[37]   The arterial Windkessel [J].
Westerhof, Nico ;
Lankhaar, Jan-Willem ;
Westerhof, Berend E. .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2009, 47 (02) :131-141