Agricultural soils of the Animas River watershed after the Gold King Mine spill: An elemental spatiotemporal analysis via portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy

被引:7
作者
Jha, Gaurav [1 ,2 ]
Mukhopadhyay, Swagata [3 ]
Ulery, April L. [1 ]
Lombard, Kevin [1 ]
Chakraborty, Somsubhra [3 ]
Weindorf, David C. [4 ]
VanLeeuwen, Dawn [5 ]
Brungard, Colby [1 ]
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Indian Inst Technol, Agr & Food Engn Dept, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
[4] Cent Michigan Univ, Dep Earth & Atmospher Sci, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
[5] New Mexico State Univ, Dep Econ Appl Stat & Int Business Dev, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
关键词
RAPID ASSESSMENT; LEAD; CONTAMINATION; VARIABILITY; RISKS;
D O I
10.1002/jeq2.20209
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In August 2015, 11.3 million L of heavy metal-contaminated water spilled into the Animas River from the Gold King Mine (Colorado, USA). National attention focused on water quality and agricultural production in areas affected by the spill. In response to local concerns, surface soil elemental concentrations were analyzed in three New Mexico agricultural fields to determine potential threats to agronomic production. Irrigated fields in the Animas watershed were scanned using portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) spectrometry to monitor the spatiotemporal variability of Pb, As, Cu, and Cr. A total of 175 locations were scanned using PXRF before and after the growing season for 3 yr. The geostatistical model with the lowest RMSE was chosen as the optimal model. The lowest RMSE for the elements ranged from to 0.10 to 0.44 m for As, from 0.50 to 0.98 m for Cr, from 0.15 to 0.91 m for Cu, and from 0.14 to 0.44 m for Pb across the models selected. The spatial dependence between the measured values exhibited strong to moderate autocorrelation for all metals except for As, for which spatial dependence was strong to weak. Some areas in each field exceeded the New Mexico Environment Department soil screening limit of 7.07 mg As kg(-1). All sampling locations were below the screening limit at last sampling time in 2019. Mixed models used for temporal analysis showed a significant decrease only in As below the screening value at the end of the study. Results indicate that the agricultural soils were below the soil screening guideline values.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 743
页数:14
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Metals Analysis of Agricultural Soils via Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry
    Hu, Wenyou
    Huang, Biao
    Weindorf, David C.
    Chen, Yong
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 92 (04) : 420 - 426
  • [2] Determination of base saturation percentage in agricultural soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer
    Rawal, Ashmita
    Chakraborty, Somsubhra
    Li, Bin
    Lewis, Katie
    Godoy, Maria
    Paulette, Laura
    Weindorf, David C.
    GEODERMA, 2019, 338 : 375 - 382
  • [3] In situ investigation of heavy metals at trace concentrations in greenhouse soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy
    Tian, Kang
    Huang, Biao
    Xing, Zhe
    Hu, Wenyou
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (11) : 11011 - 11022
  • [4] Lithologic Discontinuity Assessment in Soils via Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and Visible Near-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy
    Weindorf, David C.
    Chakraborty, Somsubhra
    Aldabaa, Abdalsamad Abdalsatar Ali
    Paulette, Laura
    Corti, Giuseppe
    Cocco, Stefania
    Micheli, Erika
    Wang, Dandan
    Li, Bin
    Man, Titus
    Sharma, Aakriti
    Person, Taylor
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2015, 79 (06) : 1704 - 1716
  • [5] Relationship between elemental content determined via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and traditional acid-digestion-based methods in tropical soils
    Gomes de Faria, Alvaro Jose
    Godinho Silva, Sergio Henrique
    Azevedo Melo, Leonidas Carrijo
    Botelho, Livia
    Guimaraes Guilherme, Luiz Roberto
    Curi, Nilton
    SOIL RESEARCH, 2022, 60 (07) : 661 - 677