Lessons for Data-Driven Modelling from Harmonics in the Norwegian Grid

被引:0
作者
Hoffmann, Volker [1 ]
Torsaeter, Bendik Nybakk [2 ]
Rosenlund, Gjert Hovland [2 ]
Andresen, Christian Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Digital, Dept Sustainable Commun Technol, Forskningsveien 1, N-0373 Oslo, Norway
[2] SINTEF Energi AS, Dept Energy Syst, Sem Saelands Vei 11, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
machine learning; power systems; harmonic distortion; power quality; POWER QUALITY ISSUES; PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE; FRACTAL DIMENSION; SYSTEM; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3390/a15060188
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With the advancing integration of fluctuating renewables, a more dynamic demand-side, and a grid running closer to its operational limits, future power system operators require new tools to anticipate unwanted events. Advances in machine learning and availability of data suggest great potential in using data-driven approaches, but these will only ever be as good as the data they are based on. To lay the ground-work for future data-driven modelling, we establish a baseline state by analysing the statistical distribution of voltage measurements from three sites in the Norwegian power grid (22, 66, and 300 kV). Measurements span four years, are line and phase voltages, are cycle-by-cycle, and include all (even and odd) harmonics up to the 96 order. They are based on four years of historical data from three Elspec Power Quality Analyzers (corresponding to one trillion samples), which we have extracted, processed, and analyzed. We find that: (i) the distribution of harmonics depends on phase and voltage level; (ii) there is little power beyond the 13 harmonic; (iii) there is temporal clumping of extreme values; and (iv) there is seasonality on different time-scales. For machine learning based modelling these findings suggest that: (i) models should be trained in two steps (first with data from all sites, then adapted to site-level); (ii) including harmonics beyond the 13 is unlikely to increase model performance, and that modelling should include features that (iii) encode the state of the grid, as well as (iv) seasonality.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 83 条
[71]  
Van Rossum G., 2009, Python 3 Reference Manual
[72]   The Power Quality Forecasting Model for Off-Grid System Supported by Multiobjective Optimization [J].
Vantuch, Tomas ;
Misak, Stanislav ;
Jezowicz, Tomas ;
Burianek, Tomas ;
Snasel, Vaclav .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2017, 64 (12) :9507-9516
[73]  
Viegas JL, 2016, IEEE INT POWER ELEC, P436, DOI 10.1109/EPEPEMC.2016.7752037
[74]   Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A review [J].
Voyant, Cyril ;
Notton, Gilles ;
Kalogirou, Soteris ;
Nivet, Marie-Laure ;
Paoli, Christophe ;
Motte, Fabrice ;
Fouilloy, Alexis .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 105 :569-582
[75]   Distribution System Planning Considering Stochastic EV Penetration and V2G Behavior [J].
Wang, Xiaolin ;
Nie, Yongquan ;
Cheng, Ka-Wai Eric .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 21 (01) :149-158
[76]   A survey of transfer learning [J].
Weiss K. ;
Khoshgoftaar T.M. ;
Wang D.D. .
Journal of Big Data, 2016, 3 (01)
[77]   Stochastic control of smart home energy management with plug-in electric vehicle battery energy storage and photovoltaic array [J].
Wu, Xiaohua ;
Hu, Xiaosong ;
Moura, Scott ;
Yin, Xiaofeng ;
Pickert, Volker .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2016, 333 :203-212
[78]   Data-Driven Multi-Hidden Markov Model-Based Power Quality Disturbance Prediction That Incorporates Weather Conditions [J].
Xiao, Fei ;
Ai, Qian .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (01) :402-412
[79]   Automatic hourly solar forecasting using machine learning models [J].
Yagli, Gokhan Mert ;
Yang, Dazhi ;
Srinivasan, Dipti .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 105 :487-498
[80]  
Yu T., 2020, arXiv