Lessons for Data-Driven Modelling from Harmonics in the Norwegian Grid

被引:0
作者
Hoffmann, Volker [1 ]
Torsaeter, Bendik Nybakk [2 ]
Rosenlund, Gjert Hovland [2 ]
Andresen, Christian Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Digital, Dept Sustainable Commun Technol, Forskningsveien 1, N-0373 Oslo, Norway
[2] SINTEF Energi AS, Dept Energy Syst, Sem Saelands Vei 11, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
machine learning; power systems; harmonic distortion; power quality; POWER QUALITY ISSUES; PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE; FRACTAL DIMENSION; SYSTEM; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3390/a15060188
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With the advancing integration of fluctuating renewables, a more dynamic demand-side, and a grid running closer to its operational limits, future power system operators require new tools to anticipate unwanted events. Advances in machine learning and availability of data suggest great potential in using data-driven approaches, but these will only ever be as good as the data they are based on. To lay the ground-work for future data-driven modelling, we establish a baseline state by analysing the statistical distribution of voltage measurements from three sites in the Norwegian power grid (22, 66, and 300 kV). Measurements span four years, are line and phase voltages, are cycle-by-cycle, and include all (even and odd) harmonics up to the 96 order. They are based on four years of historical data from three Elspec Power Quality Analyzers (corresponding to one trillion samples), which we have extracted, processed, and analyzed. We find that: (i) the distribution of harmonics depends on phase and voltage level; (ii) there is little power beyond the 13 harmonic; (iii) there is temporal clumping of extreme values; and (iv) there is seasonality on different time-scales. For machine learning based modelling these findings suggest that: (i) models should be trained in two steps (first with data from all sites, then adapted to site-level); (ii) including harmonics beyond the 13 is unlikely to increase model performance, and that modelling should include features that (iii) encode the state of the grid, as well as (iv) seasonality.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Al-Sheikh H, 2012, 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGIES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (REDEC)
[2]  
Andresen C.A., 2020, 2020 INT C SMART EN
[3]  
Andresen CA, 2018, IEEE INT WORKS APPL, P122
[4]   Transformation of Smart Grid using Machine Learning [J].
Azad, Salahuddin ;
Sabrina, Fariza ;
Wasimi, Saleh .
2019 29TH AUSTRALASIAN UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (AUPEC), 2019,
[5]   Power Quality Issues, Solutions and Standards: A Technology Review [J].
Balasubramaniam, P. M. ;
Prabha, S. U. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 18 (04) :371-380
[6]   Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for prediction of smart grid stability† [J].
Bashir, Ali Kashif ;
Khan, Suleman ;
Prabadevi, B. ;
Deepa, N. ;
Alnumay, Waleed S. ;
Gadekallu, Thippa Reddy ;
Maddikunta, Praveen Kumar Reddy .
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2021, 31 (09)
[7]   Machine Learning for Photovoltaic Systems Condition Monitoring: A Review [J].
Berghout, Tarek ;
Benbouzid, Mohamed ;
Ma, Xiandong ;
Djurovic, Sinisa ;
Mouss, Leila-Hayet .
IECON 2021 - 47TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2021,
[8]   Condition monitoring and predictive maintenance methodologies for hydropower plants equipment [J].
Betti, Alessandro ;
Crisostomi, Emanuele ;
Paolinelli, Gianluca ;
Piazzi, Antonio ;
Ruffini, Fabrizio ;
Tucci, Mauro .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 171 (171) :246-253
[9]  
Bordin Chiara, 2020, Procedia Computer Science, V176, P1659, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.190
[10]   PV System Predictive Maintenance: Challenges, Current Approaches, and Opportunities [J].
Bosman, Lisa B. ;
Leon-Salas, Walter D. ;
Hutzel, William ;
Soto, Esteban A. .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (06)