The secret life of PETs A cross-sectional analysis of interest in privacy enhancing technologies

被引:8
作者
Makin, David A. [1 ]
Ireland, Leanna [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Criminal Justice & Criminol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Sociol, Blacksburg, VA USA
关键词
Privacy-enhancing technologies; Encryption; Cross-sectional analysis; PETs; PGP; Tor; DARK SIDE; TOR; CONFIDENCE; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2019-0124
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore to what extent the legal environment influences a user's choice to employ privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs). Drawing upon existing theoretical frames specific to arbitrariness and uncertainty, this research examines whether interest in PETs is influenced by the legal environment of a country. Design/methodology/approach Using data from Google Trends, the International Property Rights Index, Freedom House and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the research analyzes interest in Tor, VPN technology and pretty good privacy (PGP) in 153 countries between 2012 and 2016. Findings Findings suggest both countries with both higher and lower arbitrariness and uncertainty of law are associated with an increased interest in Tor and PGP. However, interest in VPN technology does not appear influenced by the legal environment and, instead, is influenced by freedom within the press. Research limitations/implications - The dual use nature of Tor and PGP is influenced by law enforcement and judiciary effectiveness and transparency and arbitrariness contributing to the public's interest in decentralized technological protections. Practical implications - Law enforcement should continue to police via the technologies rather than shutting them down to protect the identities of those needing to use these technologies for legitimate purposes. Only by embracing the technologies, as opposed to seeing them as hurdles to be banned, may law enforcement agencies remain vigilant to the threats posted by nefarious actors. Originality/value In this study, the authors introduce a more robust measure of interest in PETs, and do so with a larger, more substantive sample. By situating this interest within the context of policing, the authors can document the dual use nature of the technology, which can be useful in guiding future research, specifically in the area of policy development and officer training.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 136
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring undergraduate students' conceptions of learning via auto-photography: A cross-sectional analysis
    Huang, Wen-Lung
    Li, Liang-Yi
    Tsai, Chin-Chung
    BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2022, 48 (01) : 160 - 181
  • [42] Diabetes care quality according to facility setting: A cross-sectional analysis in six Peruvian regions
    Calderon-Ticona, Jorge R.
    Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
    Villamonte, Georgina
    Laban-Seminario, L. Max
    Helguero-Santin, Luis M.
    Jaime Miranda, J.
    Lazo-Porras, Maria
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2021, 15 (03) : 488 - 494
  • [43] Current Public Trends in the Discussion of Dry Eyes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Popular Content on TikTok
    Naseer, Shahrukh
    Hasan, Sazid
    Bhuiyan, Julia
    Prasad, Anuradha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [44] Factors affecting social isolation among the young adults in South Korea: A cross-sectional analysis
    Lee, Soo-Bi
    Shin, Yerim
    Jeon, Yebin
    Kim, Seohyun
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [45] Durability of Vaccine-Induced Immunity Against Tetanus and Diphtheria Toxins: A Cross-sectional Analysis
    Hammarlund, Erika
    Thomas, Archana
    Poore, Elizabeth A.
    Amanna, Ian J.
    Rynko, Abby E.
    Mori, Motomi
    Chen, Zunqiu
    Slifka, Mark K.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 62 (09) : 1111 - 1118
  • [46] The Factors Associated With Confidence in Using the Internet to Access Health Information: Cross-sectional Data Analysis
    Van Heel, Kasi Lou
    Nelson, Anna
    Handysides, Daniel
    Shah, Huma
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 7
  • [47] Cross-sectional analysis of self-promotional language in texts of grant proposals across gender
    Heyard, Rachel
    Lim, Sandar
    Jorstad, Anne
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2025, 34
  • [48] The use of systematic reviews to justify orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional analysis
    Johnson, Austin L.
    Walters, Corbin
    Gray, Harrison
    Torgerson, Trevor
    Checketts, Jake X.
    Boose, Marshall
    Norris, Brent
    Vassar, Matt
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2020, 51 (02): : 212 - 217
  • [49] Matching method to paradigm in strategy research: Limitations of cross-sectional analysis and some methodological alternatives
    Bowen, HP
    Wiersema, MF
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 20 (07) : 625 - 636
  • [50] Assessing uptake of the core outcome set in clinical trials for immune thrombocytopenia: A cross-sectional analysis
    Chaudhry, Mahad
    Stadler, John K.
    Fitzgerald, Kyle
    Modi, Jay
    Jones, Garrett
    Magana, Kimberly
    Ward, Shaelyn
    Magee, Trevor
    Hughes, Griffin
    Ford, Alicia Ito
    Vassar, Matt
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2024, 234 : 113 - 119