Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review

被引:168
作者
Mizumoto, Ryan M. [1 ]
Yilmaz, Burak [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Dent, Div Restorat Sci & Prosthodont, Adv Prosthodont Program, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Dent, Div Restorat Sci & Prosthodont, 3001-A Postle Hall,305 West 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
3D MODEL ACQUISITION; IN-VITRO; IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES; DIGITAL IMPRESSIONS; 3-DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY; ARCH IMPRESSIONS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; EDENTULOUS JAW; TECHNOLOGY; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Intraoral scan body (ISB) design is highly variable and its role in the digital workflow and accuracy of digital scans is not well understood. Purpose. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the relevant reports pertaining to ISBs with regard to design and accuracy and to describe their evolution and role in the digital dentistry workflow. Special attention was placed on their key features in relation to intraoral scanning technology and the digitization process. Materials and methods. A MEDLINE/PubMed search was performed to identify relevant reports pertaining to ISB usage in dentistry. This search included but was not limited to scan body features and design, scan body accuracy, and scan body techniques and the role of ISBs in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) processes. Commercially available scan bodies were examined, and a patient situation was shown highlighting the use of ISBs in the digital workflow. Results. Deficiencies in the reports were found regarding various scan body topics, including ISB features/design, accuracy, and the role of ISBs in CAD-CAM processes. Conclusions. ISBs are complex implant-positioning-transfer devices that play an essential role in the digital workflow and fabrication of accurately fitting implant-supported restorations. With scanner technology rapidly evolving and becoming more widespread, future studies are needed and should be directed toward all parts of the digital workflow when using ISBs. By understanding the basic components of ISBs and how they relate to digital scanning and CAD CAM technology, more emphasis may be placed on their importance and usage in the digital workflow to ensure accurate transfer of implant position to the virtual and analog definitive cast. Efforts should be made by clinicians to identify an optimal ISB design in relation to the specific intraoral scanning technology being used.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 352
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review
    Ahlholm, Pekka
    Sipila, Kirsi
    Vallittu, Pekka
    Jakonen, Minna
    Kotiranta, Ulla
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (01): : 35 - 41
  • [2] AN IN VITRO COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS WITH CODED HEALING ABUTMENTS AND DIFFERENT IMPLANT ANGULATIONS
    Al-Abdullah, Khaled
    Zandparsa, Roya
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Hirayama, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 110 (02) : 90 - 100
  • [3] Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study
    Amin, Sarah
    Weber, Hans Peter
    Finkelman, Matthew
    El Rafie, Khaled
    Kudara, Yukio
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) : 1360 - 1367
  • [4] Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Implant Impression Approach: A Three-Dimensional Comparative In Vitro Analysis
    Basaki, Kinga
    Alkumru, Hasan
    De Souza, Grace
    Finer, Yoav
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (04) : 792 - 799
  • [5] Bergin JM, 2013, J PROSTHET DENT, V110, P243, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60370-4
  • [6] The 3D model acquisition pipeline
    Bernardini, F
    Rushmeier, H
    [J]. COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 2002, 21 (02) : 149 - 172
  • [7] Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations
    Beuer, F.
    Schweiger, J.
    Edelhoff, D.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2008, 204 (09) : 505 - 511
  • [8] Digital process for an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report
    Brandt, Jan
    Lauer, Hans-Christoph
    Peter, Thorsten
    Brandt, Silvia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 114 (04) : 469 - 473
  • [9] A survey of free-form object representation and recognition techniques
    Campbell, RJ
    Flynn, PJ
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2001, 81 (02) : 166 - 210
  • [10] Campen M, 2012, PRACTICAL GUIDE POLY, DOI [10.2312/conf.EG2012.tutorials.t4, DOI 10.2312/CONF.EG2012.TUTORIALS.T4]