Prey capture behavior in three Neotropical armored harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones)

被引:6
作者
Costa, Thaiany M. [1 ,3 ]
Silva, Norton F. S. [1 ,2 ]
Willemart, Rodrigo H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Artes Ciencias & Humanidades, Lab Ecol Sensorial & Comportamento Artropodes, Rua Arlindo Bettio 1000, BR-03828000 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Programa Posgrad Ecol & Evolucao, Campus Diadema,Rua Prof Artur Riedel 275, BR-09972270 Diadema, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Biociencias, Programa Posgrad Zool, Rua Matao 321,Travessa 14, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Detection; Foraging; Handling; Prey capture; Gonyleptidae; Cosmetidae; CONTACT CHEMORECEPTION; GONIOSOMA-SPELAEUM; FORAGING MODE; PHYLOGENY; SCORPIONS; BIOLOGY; DIET;
D O I
10.1007/s10164-016-0464-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Acquiring food requires success in all the distinct phases of foraging, among which are detecting, capturing and handling prey. We have looked at prey detection, capturing and handling in three species of armored harvestmen differing in leg length and pedipalp morphology: Discocyrtus pectinifemur, Heteromitobates discolor and Gryne perlata. We recorded males and females in captivity capturing 0.5- to 0.7-mm-long immature crickets without legs III and provide the first detailed description of prey capture in harvestmen of the suborder Laniatores. We have shown that these three species can detect live prey without touching it but only at close range (< 1 cm). The success at the strike phase was: 27.2 % for D. pectinifemur, 50 % for G. perlata and 72.7 % for H. discolor. Combining the probability of detection without contact with that of successful capturing of the two-legged cricket, the success rate of G. perlata, D. pectinifemur and H. discolor were, respectively, 2, 21 and 32 %. Only one cricket escaped from within the pedipalps of the harvestmen (G. perlata, smooth pedipalps). The long-legged H. discolor, which forage in open areas, had a higher success and, after detection, took less time to attack crickets in open areas. Compared to other arachnids, prey detection happens at close range and capture success in Laniatores is low. However, omnivory probably minimizes these limitations in capturing live prey.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 190
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Acosta Luis E., 2007, P309
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, Biostatistical Analysis
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, SPIDERS WORLD SENSES
  • [4] Feeding habitat selection by hunting leopards Panthera pardus in a woodland savanna:: prey catchability versus abundance
    Balme, Guy
    Hunter, Luke
    Slotow, Rob
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2007, 74 : 589 - 598
  • [5] Development of prey-specific predatory behavior in a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae)
    Bartos, Maciej
    Szczepko, Katarzyna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY, 2012, 40 (02) : 228 - 233
  • [6] Bothma J. du P., 1997, Koedoe, V40, P41
  • [7] Observations on the diet of the North African houbara bustard during the non-breeding season
    Bourass, K.
    Leger, J. -F.
    Zaime, A.
    Qninba, A.
    Rguibi, H.
    El Agbani, M. A.
    Benhoussa, A.
    Hingrat, Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2012, 82 : 53 - 59
  • [8] Brownell P, 2001, SCORPION BIOLOGY AND RESEARCH, P159
  • [9] PREY-LOCALIZING BEHAVIOR OF THE NOCTURNAL DESERT SCORPION, PARUROCTONUS-MESAENSIS - ORIENTATION TO SUBSTRATE VIBRATIONS
    BROWNELL, P
    FARLEY, RD
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1979, 27 (FEB) : 185 - &
  • [10] FORAGING MODE, PREY CHEMICAL-DISCRIMINATION, AND PHYLOGENY IN LIZARDS
    COOPER, WE
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1995, 50 : 973 - 985