Self-efficacy for Coping with cancer: Psychometric properties of the Cancer Behavior Inventory version 3.0-Korean

被引:5
作者
Lee, Hana [1 ]
Merluzzi, Thomas V. [2 ]
Choi, Noella Yunyoung [3 ,4 ]
Lee, Jiyeon [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Coll Nursing, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Psychol, Indiana, PA USA
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Nursing, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 30722, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Brain Korea FOUR Project 21, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Mo Im Kim Nursing Res Inst, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 30722, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Cancer; Coping; Self-efficacy; Spirituality; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; DEPRESSION; VALIDATION; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101957
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To validate the Cancer Behavior Inventory version 3.0 - Korean (CBI 3.0 - K), a holistic measure of selfefficacy for coping with cancer by including spiritual coping subscale. Method: Psychometric properties of the CBI 3.0 - K were evaluated among 453 cancer patients. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine structural validity. Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's alpha. For convergent validity, correlations with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gastric Gastric Cancer Subscale (GaCS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being (FACT-Sp) subscale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/QoL subscale were analyzed. Results: The CBI 3.0 - K supported the original 7 factor structure of the CBI Version 3.0 with relocation of one item which reflected self-efficacy for coping utilizing personal resources. High levels of internal consistencies were demonstrated. Convergent validity was established with moderate to strong correlations with the GaCS, the HADS, the FACIT-Sp, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, and moderate correlation with the MSPSS. Known group validity with the Using Spiritual Coping subscale was demonstrated. Conclusions: The CBI 3.0 - K will facilitate comprehensive assessment of patients' self-efficacy for coping by including spiritual coping subscale. Assessment on responsiveness of the CBI 3.0 - K to interventions designed to enhance coping is strongly recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Investigation of the relationship among fatigue, self-efficacy and quality of life during chemotherapy in patients with breast, lung or gastrointestinal cancer
    Akin, Semiha
    Guner, Canan Kas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (01)
  • [2] SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY OF SELF-REGULATION
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 248 - 287
  • [3] SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [4] Bandura A., 1997, Social learning theory
  • [5] Enabling, Not Cultivating: Received Social Support and Self-Efficacy Explain Quality of Life After Lung Cancer Surgery
    Banik, Anna
    Luszczynska, Aleksandra
    Pawlowska, Izabela
    Cieslak, Roman
    Knoll, Nina
    Scholz, Urte
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [6] Factor structure of the autonomy preference index in people with severe mental illness
    Bonfils, Kelsey A.
    Adams, Erin L.
    Mueser, Kim T.
    Wright-Berryman, Jennifer L.
    Salyers, Michelle P.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2015, 228 (03) : 526 - 530
  • [7] The Psychometric Properties of Cancer Behavior Inventory as a Predictor of Quality of Life in Turkish Cancer Patients
    Bozo, Ozlem
    Akinci, Irem
    Akyuz, Cansu
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 38 (01) : 229 - 238
  • [8] Self-efficacy, cancer-related fatigue, and quality of life in patients with resected lung cancer
    Chen, Hong-Lin
    Liu, Kun
    You, Qing-Sheng
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2018, 27 (06)
  • [9] Chun CA, 2006, INT CUL PSY, P29
  • [10] Comrey A. L., 1992, 1 COURSE FACTOR ANAL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315827506-16