The challenge of integrating innovation and quality management practice

被引:31
作者
Palm, K. [1 ]
Lilja, J. [1 ]
Wiklund, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Qual Management Mech Engn & Math, Ostersund, Sweden
关键词
quality; innovation; organisational learning; quality management; public sector; PUBLIC-SECTOR; KNOWLEDGE; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; TQM;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2014.939841
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Following in the footsteps of 'New Public Management', where quality management and quality control have become widely implemented concepts among public authorities, there is now a subsequent government demand to also be innovative. However, integrating and achieving a balance between improved quality and increased innovation is not an easy task. Previous research indicates a complex and ambiguous relation, raising questions as to how to optimally combine these two approaches organisationally, operationally, and culturally. Is there an 'edge of chaos' where there is maximal flexibility for innovation while maintaining sufficient order for quality? The purpose of this paper is to examine the potential integration of innovation and quality management practice within the public sector. The paper is based on a multiple case study design, confronted with existing literature, and shows that the current quality management practice is perceived as being related to standardisation, leading to a decrease in the space for innovation. Second, that there is an expectation and belief that innovation and quality management can be handled in parallel and reinforce each other instead of being mutually detrimental.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 47
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Abernathy WilliamJ., 1978, The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry
[2]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[3]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, MANAGING INNOVATION
[5]  
Argyris C., 1978, Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective
[6]   Business strategies in more- and less-innovative firms in Canada [J].
Baldwin, JR ;
Johnson, J .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1996, 25 (05) :785-804
[7]  
Bookman B., 1994, Journal for Quality and Participation, V17, P70
[8]  
Borins S., 2001, J INTELLECT CAP, V3, P310, DOI DOI 10.1108/14691930110400128
[9]   Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective [J].
Brown, JS ;
Duguid, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (02) :198-213
[10]  
Byrne G., 2007, STRATEGY LEADERSHIP, V35, P5, DOI DOI 10.1108/10878570710734480