An effort saving method to establish global aerodynamic model using CFD

被引:3
作者
Xie, Jingfeng [1 ]
Huang, Jun [1 ]
Song, Lei [1 ]
Fu, Jingcheng [1 ]
Lu, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Aeronaut Sci & Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Aerodynamic; Modeling; CFD; Recursive method;
D O I
10.1108/AEAT-10-2021-0299
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Purpose The typical approach of modeling the aerodynamics of an aircraft is to develop a complete database through testing or computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The database will be huge if it has a reasonable resolution and requires an unacceptable CFD effort during the conceptional design. Therefore, this paper aims to reduce the computing effort required via establishing a general aerodynamic model that needs minor parameters. Design/methodology/approach The model structure was a preconfigured polynomial model, and the parameters were estimated with a recursive method to further reduce the calculation effort. To uniformly disperse the sample points through each step, a unique recursive sampling method based on a Voronoi diagram was presented. In addition, a multivariate orthogonal function approach was used. Findings A case study of a flying wing aircraft demonstrated that generating a model with acceptable precision (0.01 absolute error or 5% relative error) costs only 1/54 of the cost of creating a database. A series of six degrees of freedom flight simulations shows that the model's prediction was accurate. Originality/value This method proposed a new way to simplify the model and recursive sampling. It is a low-cost way of obtaining high-fidelity models during primary design, allowing for more precise flight dynamics analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
Morelli E.A., 2003, Proceedings of the 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, P0653, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2003-653
[22]  
Morelli E.A., 2012, AIAA Paper 2012-1050, DOI [10.2514/6.2012-1050, DOI 10.2514/6.2012-1050]
[23]  
Morelli E.A., 2016, AIRCRAFT SYSTEM IDEN, V2nd
[24]   GLOBAL NONLINEAR AERODYNAMIC MODELING USING MULTIVARIATE ORTHOGONAL FUNCTIONS [J].
MORELLI, EA .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1995, 32 (02) :270-277
[25]   Nonlinear Unsteady Aerodynamic Modeling Using Wind-Tunnel and Computational Data [J].
Murphy, Patrick C. ;
Klein, Vladislav ;
Frink, Neal T. .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2017, 54 (02) :659-683
[26]  
Pascanu R., 2013, PMLR, P1310, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1211.5063
[27]  
Plaetschke E., 1988, APPL SYSTEM IDENTIFI, P421, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-2628-8_11
[28]   Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data [J].
Schmid, Peter J. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2010, 656 :5-28
[29]   Nonlinear Unsteady Aerodynamics Reduced Order Model of Airfoils Based on Algorithm Fusion and Multifidelity Framework [J].
Shi, Yan ;
Wan, Zhiqiang ;
Wu, Zhigang ;
Yang, Chao .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
[30]   Modal Analysis of Fluid Flows: Applications and Outlook [J].
Taira, Kunihiko ;
Hemati, Maziar S. ;
Brunton, Steven L. ;
Sun, Yiyang ;
Duraisamy, Karthik ;
Bagheri, Shervin ;
Dawson, Scott T. M. ;
Yeh, Chi-An .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2020, 58 (03) :998-1022