The AI-Atlas: Didactics for Teaching AI and Machine Learning On-Site, Online, and Hybrid

被引:17
作者
Stadelmann, Thilo [1 ,5 ]
Keuzenkamp, Julian [2 ]
Grabner, Helmut [3 ]
Wursch, Christoph [4 ]
机构
[1] ZHAW Zurich Univ Appl Sci, CAI Ctr Artificial Intelligence, Obere Kirchgasse 2, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] ZHAW Zurich Univ Appl Sci, ZHAW Digital, Gertrudstr 15, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
[3] ZHAW Zurich Univ Appl Sci, IDP Inst Data Anal & Proc Design, Rosenstr 3, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
[4] OST Eastern Switzerland Univ Appl Sci, ICE Inst Computat Engn, Werdenbergstr 4, CH-9471 Buchs, Switzerland
[5] ECLT European Ctr Living Technol, I-30123 Venice, Italy
来源
EDUCATION SCIENCES | 2021年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
flexible educational design; e-learning; constructivism; design-based research; COVID-19; post-pandemic tertiary engineering education; artificial intelligence; LESSONS;
D O I
10.3390/educsci11070318
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We present the "AI-Atlas" didactic concept as a coherent set of best practices for teaching Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to a technical audience in tertiary education, and report on its implementation and evaluation within a design-based research framework and two actual courses: an introduction to AI within the final year of an undergraduate computer science program, as well as an introduction to ML within an interdisciplinary graduate program in engineering. The concept was developed in reaction to the recent AI surge and corresponding demand for foundational teaching on the subject to a broad and diverse audience, with on-site teaching of small classes in mind and designed to build on the specific strengths in motivational public speaking of the lecturers. The research question and focus of our evaluation is to what extent the concept serves this purpose, specifically taking into account the necessary but unforeseen transfer to ongoing hybrid and fully online teaching since March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our contribution is two-fold: besides (i) presenting a general didactic concept for tertiary engineering education in AI and ML, ready for adoption, we (ii) draw conclusions from the comparison of qualitative student evaluations (n = 24-30) and quantitative exam results (n = 62-113) of two full semesters under pandemic conditions with the result of previous years (participants from Zurich, Switzerland). This yields specific recommendations for the adoption of any technical curriculum under flexible teaching conditions-be it on-site, hybrid, or online.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Adams A., 2020, Public Services Quarterly, V16, P172, DOI DOI 10.1080/15228959.2020.1778598
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1956, HDB 1 COGNITIVE DOMA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, P EDMEDIA 2003 C HON
  • [4] Aoun JE, 2017, ROBOT-PROOF: HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P1
  • [5] Bityukov S. I., 2016, Nuclear Energy and Technology, V2, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.007
  • [6] Bloom B., 1984, Bloom taxonomy of educational objectives
  • [7] Braschler M., 2019, APPL DATA SCI
  • [8] Brockman Greg, 2016, arXiv
  • [9] Brodie ML, 2019, APPL DATA SCI LESSON, P131
  • [10] Sustainable Curriculum Planning for Artificial Intelligence Education: A Self-determination Theory Perspective
    Chiu, Thomas K. F.
    Chai, Ching-sing
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)