Embedding self-explanation prompts to support learning via instructional video

被引:6
作者
Bai, Caixia [1 ]
Yang, Jingying [1 ]
Tang, Yun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, 152 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Adolescent Cyberpsychol & Behav, 152 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Key Lab Appl Expt Psychol, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Self-explanation; Prompting; Prior knowledge; Cognitive load; Instructional video; ICAP framework; COGNITIVE LOAD; STUDENTS; SEGMENTATION; FRAMEWORK; EXAMPLES; STRATEGY; SPOKEN; ILLUSTRATIONS; ANIMATIONS; TEXT;
D O I
10.1007/s11251-022-09587-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Instructional videos have been widely used in online learning environments. Effective video learning requires self-regulation by learners, which can be facilitated by deliberate instructional design, such as through prompting. Grounded in the interactive, constructive, active, and passive (ICAP) framework, this study compared the effects of explanation prompts and explored how they affected the retention and transfer of learning. In an online experiment, 103 participants were randomly assigned to focused self-explanation, scaffolded self-explanation, and instructional explanation prompting conditions. The results indicated better retention performance from the scaffolded prompt than from the focused prompt. No differences were found in transfer performance across various forms of prompts. Regression analysis suggested that prior knowledge and cognitive load may have interacted with the effect of self-explanation prompts. Prior knowledge positively predicted transfer performance, and cognitive load negatively predicted transfer performance when focused or scaffolded prompts were implemented. Potential explanations concerning how self-explanation prompts affect learning were discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 701
页数:21
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Fostering active processing of instructional explanations of learners with high and low prior knowledge [J].
Acuna, Santiago R. ;
Garcia Rodicio, Hector ;
Sanchez, Emilio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2011, 26 (04) :435-452
[2]   The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams [J].
Ainsworth, S ;
Loizou, AT .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2003, 27 (04) :669-681
[3]   An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor [J].
Aleven, VAWMM ;
Koedinger, KR .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2002, 26 (02) :147-179
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CAMBRIDGE HDB MULTIM, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.017, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.015]
[5]   Problem-solving or Explicit Instruction: Which Should Go First When Element Interactivity Is High? [J].
Ashman, Greg ;
Kalyuga, Slava ;
Sweller, John .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 32 (01) :229-247
[6]   Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps [J].
Atkinson, RK ;
Renkl, A ;
Merrill, MM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 95 (04) :774-783
[7]   Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations [J].
Berthold, Kirsten ;
Eysink, Tessa H. S. ;
Renkl, Alexander .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (04) :345-363
[8]   Inducing Self-Explanation: a Meta-Analysis [J].
Bisra, Kiran ;
Liu, Qing ;
Nesbit, John C. ;
Salimi, Farimah ;
Winne, Philip H. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2018, 30 (03) :703-725
[9]   What animated illustrations conditions can improve technical document comprehension in young students? Format, signaling and control of the presentation [J].
Boucheix, JM ;
Guignard, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2005, 20 (04) :369-388
[10]   Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load [J].
Castro-Alonso, Juan C. ;
de Koning, Bjorn B. ;
Fiorella, Logan ;
Paas, Fred .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 33 (04) :1379-1407