Governmental inspection and local legislation on environmental protection: Evidence from China

被引:28
作者
Ding, Zifang [1 ]
Gao, Xiang [2 ]
Qian, Xuesong [1 ]
Wang, Huanhuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Business Sch, Res Ctr Finance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] East China Normal Univ, Sch Law, 500 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
关键词
campaign-style governance approach; central inspection of environmental protection; difference-in-difference method; judicial consequences; local environmental legislation; AUTHORITARIAN ENVIRONMENTALISM; AIR-POLLUTION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; INFORMAL REGULATION; ENFORCEMENT; REGULATIONS; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; DISCLOSURE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1111/joes.12431
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using China's central inspection of environmental protection as a natural experiment, this paper adopts a difference-in-difference method to investigate how this campaign-style governance approach can influence the legislation process related to the conservation of nature. Our empirics find a significant facilitative effect on the enactment of local environmental protection laws in terms of both number and quality, and this facilitative effect is stronger in provinces and regions with weaker legal basis and greater environmental pollution. Moreover, we show that this facilitative effect has already begun to generate favorable judicial consequences. As for policy implications, we not only provide an overall evaluation on the performance of the central inspection, but also demonstrate China's top-down campaign-style governance indeed has a long-lasting impact on the establishment of its institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 763
页数:36
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication [J].
Aerts, Walter ;
Cormier, Denis .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2009, 34 (01) :1-27
[2]   Environmental Crime and Punishment: Empirical Evidence from the German Penal Code [J].
Almer, Christian ;
Goeschl, Timo .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2010, 86 (04) :707-726
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Accounting and Business Research, DOI [10.1080/00014788.1998.9729564, DOI 10.1080/00014788.1998.9729564]
[4]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[5]   Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (05) :1043-1075
[6]  
Bewley K, 2000, ADV ENVIRONM ACC MAN, V1, P201
[7]   THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS: A CRITICAL REVIEW [J].
Blanco, Esther ;
Rey-Maquieira, Javier ;
Lozano, Javier .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2009, 23 (03) :462-502
[8]  
Boyd O., 2012, CCEP WORKING PAPERS
[9]   Emissions trading and profitability:: The Swedish pulp and paper industry [J].
Brännlund, R ;
Chung, YH ;
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 12 (03) :345-356
[10]   Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence [J].
Chetty, Raj ;
Looney, Adam ;
Kroft, Kory .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (04) :1145-1177