Discriminative-stimulus effects of triazolam in light and moderate drinkers

被引:6
|
作者
Rush, CR [1 ]
Kelly, TH
Fillmore, MT
Hays, LR
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Behav Sci, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Dept Psychol, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
alcohol; benzodiazepines; drug discrimination; individual differences; triazolam;
D O I
10.1097/01.ALC.0000062742.29158.6E
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The results of previous laboratory experiments with humans suggest that light and moderate drinkers respond differentially to the effects of benzodiazepines. The aim of this study was to further assess the behavioral effects of a benzodiazepine in light and moderate drinkers. Methods: To accomplish this aim, 12 volunteers (6 light drinkers and 6 moderate drinkers) learned to discriminate 0.375 mg of triazolam, a triazolobenzodiazepine hypnotic. After they learned this discrimination, a test-of-novel-doses phase was conducted in which a range of doses of triazolam (0, 0.06, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.375 mg) was tested in both groups of volunteers. The subject-rated and performance-impairing effects of triazolam were assessed concurrently. Results: There was not a significant difference between the groups in terms of the number of trials needed to learn the discrimination, nor did the proportion of light and moderate drinkers who learned to accurately discriminate 0.375 mg of triazolam differ significantly. The discriminative-stimulus, subject-rated, and performance-impairing effects of triazolam were an orderly function of dose but did not differ across the light and moderate drinkers. Conclusions: Future studies should examine the discriminative-stimulus effects of a lower dose of triazolam (e.g., 0.25 mg) in light and moderate drinks or use a fading procedure to determine differences in terms of the lowest discriminable dose.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 646
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Behavioral and discriminative-stimulus effects of cholinergic channel modulators.
    McCurdy, CR
    Beach, JW
    Smith, JB
    Cutler, SJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 215 : U907 - U907
  • [22] Discriminative-stimulus effects of modafinil in cocaine-trained humans
    Rush, CR
    Kelly, TH
    Hays, LR
    Wooten, AF
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2002, 67 (03) : 311 - 322
  • [23] Methamphetamine-Like Discriminative-Stimulus Effects of Nicotinic Agonists
    Desai, Rajeev I.
    Bergman, Jack
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 348 (03): : 478 - 488
  • [24] Ethanol does not affect discriminative-stimulus effects of nicotine in rats
    Le Foll, B
    Goldberg, SR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 519 (1-2) : 96 - 102
  • [25] Serotonergic modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine in squirrel monkeys
    Kevin F. Schama
    L. L. Howell
    Larry D. Byrd
    Psychopharmacology, 1997, 132 : 27 - 34
  • [26] PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DISCRIMINATIVE-STIMULUS EFFECTS OF GBR-12909
    MELIA, KF
    SPEALMAN, RD
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 1991, 258 (02): : 626 - 632
  • [27] DISCRIMINATIVE-STIMULUS EFFECTS OF THE LOW EFFICACY MU AGONIST NALBUPHINE
    WALKER, EA
    YOUNG, AM
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 1993, 267 (01): : 322 - 330
  • [28] Risperidone attenuates the discriminative-stimulus effects of d-amphetamine in humans
    Rush, CR
    Stoops, WW
    Hays, LR
    Glaser, PEA
    Hays, LS
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 306 (01): : 195 - 204
  • [29] Discriminative-stimulus effects of cannabidiol oil in Sprague-Dawley rats
    Chalme, Rebecca L.
    Frankot, Michelle A.
    Anderson, Karen G.
    BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 35 (01): : 36 - 46
  • [30] EFFECTS OF BODY-WEIGHT ON DISCRIMINATIVE-STIMULUS CONTROL BY PHENCYCLIDINE IN THE PIGEON
    MASSEY, BW
    MCMILLAN, DE
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1987, 47 (02) : 233 - 239