Institutional processes and regulatory risk: A case study of the Thai energy sector

被引:15
作者
Jarvis, Darryl S. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Singapore 117548, Singapore
关键词
institutional endowment; institutions & regulation; regulatory risk; Thailand energy sector; PRIVATIZATION; INFRASTRUCTURE; INVESTMENT; GOVERNANCE; CAPITALISM; REFORM;
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01077.x
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Infrastructure provision the world over has undergone a series of profound changes in the manner of its financing and governance over the last 30 years or so. While the role of the state has diminished as a direct provider, builder and operator of infrastructure, its role as regulator and overseer has undergone substantial growth, increasing the regulatory burden on the state. While this transition has occurred relatively smoothly in developed country contexts, in developing countries the diffusion of the regulatory state has produced manifestly different forms of governance, stressing the regulatory capacity of existing and newly formed regulatory bodies. This paper explores the impact and manifestations of regulatory diffusion in the context of the Thai energy sector and the governance mechanisms responsible for electricity generation, transmission and distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 202
页数:28
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, WORLD BANKS ROLE ELE
[2]  
[Anonymous], IND CORPORATE CHANGE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GLOBAL BUSINESS REGU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Governance: Sound Development Management
[5]  
[Anonymous], 966 MPIFG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Infrastructure for a Seamless Asia
[7]  
BERGARA M, 1997, POLITICAL I ELECT UT
[8]   Perceiving Credible Commitments: How Independent Regulators Shape Elite Perceptions of Regulatory Quality [J].
Bertelli, Anthony M. ;
Whitford, Andrew B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 39 :517-537
[9]  
*CEPA, 2005, PPIAF MECH MIT REG R
[10]  
Chaivongvilan S., 2008, GMSARN INT, V2, P53