DETERMINATION OF THE FORAGE YIELD AND GROWTH PARAMETERS OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) WITH QUINOA (Chenopodium quinoa) INTERCROPPING AT DIFFERENT PLANT MIXTURES

被引:3
作者
Koca, Yakup Onur [1 ]
机构
[1] Adnan Menderes Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, Aydin, Turkey
关键词
Maize; quinoa; intercropping; protein yield; RGR; CGR; GDD; DRY-MATTER ACCUMULATION; BRACHIARIA-BRIZANTHA; GRAIN-YIELD; CORN-SILAGE; TEMPERATURE; DIGESTIBILITY; ADAPTATION; QUALITY; WILLD;
D O I
10.17557/tjfc.877640
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to grow maize with quinoa plants as an alternative in an intercropping system and to determine the effects of different plant mixtures on production. For this purpose, a trial was carried out in the coastal Aegean region (Aydin Province) of Turkey under Mediterranean climate conditions. In addition to 100% maize and 100% quinoa (monocultures), 3 different mixtures (75% maize-25% quinoa, 50% maize-50% quinoa and 25% maize-75% quinoa) were also created with the help of the row numbers in plots. To determine the effects of the different plant mixtures, the ash rate, forage yield and protein yield were measured in the mid-dough stage of maize. Moreover, the dry weights of the plants and plant parts (leaf, stalk and ear) were measured on 9 different sampling dates throughout the generative period, and the relative growth rate (RGR) and crop growth rate (CGR) were calculated. As a result, some climatic factors (extreme temperatures in 2020 and extreme rainfall in June 2019) had major impacts on the RGR and CGR values. Although the amount of maize dry matter increased in almost all mixtures, quinoa performed well only in the 50% quinoa-50% maize practice. In terms of forage yield and quality, quinoa can serve as a good alternative plant in intercropping systems with maize to improve the forage quality (with higher protein yields and ash rates) without reducing the forage yield excessively.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 53
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Impact of grass silage quality on greenhouse gas emissions from dairy and beef production [J].
Aby, Bente A. ;
Randby, Ashild T. ;
Bonesmo, Helge ;
Aass, Laila .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2019, 74 (03) :525-534
[2]  
Akman Z., 1999, Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry, V23, P1139
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, METEOROLOGICAL DATA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, FAO DATA
[5]   Intercropping corn with lablab bean, velvet bean, and scarlet runner bean for forage [J].
Armstrong, Kevin L. ;
Albrecht, Kenneth A. ;
Lauer, Joseph G. ;
Riday, Heathcliffe .
CROP SCIENCE, 2008, 48 (01) :371-379
[6]   Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy [J].
Awal, M. A. ;
Koshi, H. ;
Ikeda, T. .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2006, 139 (1-2) :74-83
[7]   Corn and cover crop response to corn density in an interseeding system [J].
Baributsa, Dieudonne N. ;
Foster, Eunice F. ;
Thelen, Kurt D. ;
Kravchenko, Alexandra N. ;
Mutch, Dale R. ;
Ngouajio, Mathieu .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2008, 100 (04) :981-987
[8]   Analysing crop yield and plant quality in an intercropping system using an eco-physiological model for interplant competition [J].
Baumann, DT ;
Bastiaans, L ;
Goudriaan, J ;
van Laar, HH ;
Kropff, MJ .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2002, 73 (02) :173-203
[9]   Soil temperature and planting date effects on corn yield, leaf area, and plant development [J].
Bollero, GA ;
Bullock, DG ;
Hollinger, SE .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1996, 88 (03) :385-390
[10]  
Borghi Emerson, 2007, Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, V29, P91