Benefits of visual feedback on cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a non-randomised manikin study with bystanders

被引:4
作者
Abelairas-Gomez, C. [1 ,2 ]
Gili-Roig, C. [3 ]
Lopez-Garcia, S. [4 ]
Palacios-Aguilar, J. [3 ]
Romo-Perez, V. [5 ]
Barcala-Furelos, R. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, CLINURSID Res Grp, Psychiat Radiol & Publ Hlth Dept, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Educ Sci, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[3] Univ A Coruna, Fac Sport Sci & Phys Educ, La Coruna, Spain
[4] Pontifical Univ Salamanca, Fac Educ, Salamanca, Spain
[5] Univ Vigo, Fac Educ & Sport Sci, Pontevedra, Spain
关键词
Clinical competence; education; human; manikins; prospective studies; sensory feedback; CHEST COMPRESSION QUALITY; HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST; BASIC LIFE-SUPPORT; EUROPEAN RESUSCITATION; COUNCIL GUIDELINES; CPR FEEDBACK; EDUCATION; DEVICE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1177/102490791702400301
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is vital for the survival of people who has suffered a cardiac arrest. In order to achieve a good quality CPR performance, rescuer needs a good training which could be gotten with the use of feedback devices. The aim of this study was to compare the use of visual feedback device in CPR training to learning without feedback. Methods: Ninety-nine subjects without basic life support knowledge participating in the study were divided into three groups. All of them carried out two tests: 2 minutes of CPR with compressions and ventilations. First two groups received trainings on CPR between the tests (experimental groups): one group with instructor-led training and the other one with visual feedback device. The third group did not receive any training between the tests (control group). Results: In the first test no differences among the three groups were found. The experimental groups improved their scores in the last test. The number of correct chest compressions by hand position and depth, and the number of correct rescue breaths was increased. The experimental group with visual feedback CPR training achieved better scores of quality CPR in the second test than the instructor-led training group. Conclusions: The visual feedback and instruction-led training have positive effects on the quality CPR. The use of visual feedback during learning has greater benefits than instruction-led training in the three variables analysed.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Schoolchildren as life savers: At what age do they become strong enough?
    Abelairas-Gomez, Cristian
    Rodriguez-Nunez, Antonio
    Casillas-Cabana, Marta
    Romo-Perez, Vicente
    Barcala-Furelos, Roberto
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (06) : 814 - 819
  • [2] CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system
    Abella, Benjamin S.
    Edelson, Dana P.
    Kim, Salem
    Retzer, Elizabeth
    Myklebust, Helge
    Barry, Anne M.
    O'Hearn, Nicholas
    Hoek, Terry L. Vanden
    Becker, Lance B.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2007, 73 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [3] Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest
    Abella, BS
    Alvarado, JP
    Myklebust, H
    Edelson, DP
    Barry, A
    O'Hearn, N
    Vanden Hoek, TL
    Becker, LB
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (03): : 305 - 310
  • [4] The benefits of a simplified method for CPR training of medical professionals: A randomized controlled study
    Allan, Katherine S.
    Wong, Natalie
    Aves, Theresa
    Dorian, Paul
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2013, 84 (08) : 1119 - 1124
  • [5] A counterbalanced cross-over study of the effects of visual, auditory and no feedback on performance measures in a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Cason C.L.
    Trowbridge C.
    Baxley S.M.
    Ricard M.D.
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 10 (1)
  • [6] Education in resuscitation
    Chamberlain, DA
    Hazinski, MF
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2003, 59 (01) : 11 - 43
  • [7] Improving Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With a CPR Feedback Device and Refresher Simulations (CPR CARES Study) A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Cheng, Adam
    Brown, Linda L.
    Duff, Jonathan P.
    Davidson, Jennifer
    Overly, Frank
    Tofil, Nancy M.
    Peterson, Dawn T.
    White, Marjorie L.
    Bhanji, Farhan
    Bank, Ilana
    Gottesman, Ronald
    Adler, Mark
    Zhong, John
    Grant, Vincent
    Grant, David J.
    Sudikoff, Stephanie N.
    Marohn, Kimberly
    Charnovich, Alex
    Hunt, Elizabeth A.
    Kessler, David O.
    Wong, Hubert
    Robertson, Nicola
    Lin, Yiqun
    Quynh Doan
    Duval-Arnould, Jordan M.
    Nadkarni, Vinay M.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2015, 169 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [8] Perception of CPR quality: Influence of CPR feedback, Just-in-Time CPR training and provider role
    Cheng, Adam
    Overly, Frank
    Kessler, David
    Nadkarni, Vinay M.
    Lin, Yiqun
    Doan, Quynh
    Duff, Jonathan P.
    Tofil, Nancy M.
    Bhanji, Farhan
    Adler, Mark
    Charnovich, Alex
    Hunt, Elizabeth A.
    Brown, Linda L.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2015, 87 : 44 - 50
  • [9] Immediate and 1-Year Chest Compression Quality Effect of Instantaneous Feedback in Simulated Cardiac Arrest
    Griffin, Peter
    Cooper, Clayton
    Glick, Joshua
    Terndrup, Thomas E.
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2014, 9 (04): : 264 - 269
  • [10] Teaching hand placement for chest compression - a simpler technique
    Handley, AJ
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2002, 53 (01) : 29 - 36