Pharmacodynamic Interaction of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine on Depth of Sedation and Tolerance of Laryngoscopy

被引:32
作者
Weerink, Maud A. S. [1 ]
Barends, Clemens R. M. [1 ]
Muskiet, Ernesto R. R. [1 ]
Reyntjens, Koen M. E. M. [1 ]
Knotnerus, Froukje H. [1 ]
Oostra, Martine [1 ]
van Bocxlaer, Jan F. P. [3 ]
Struys, Michel M. R. F. [1 ,2 ]
Colin, Pieter J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Anesthesiol, POB 30001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Basic & Appl Med Sci, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Bioanal, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
INCREASING PLASMA-CONCENTRATIONS; TARGET-CONTROLLED INFUSION; INTRAMUSCULAR DEXMEDETOMIDINE; INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ALPHA2-ADRENOCEPTOR AGONIST; PREOPERATIVE DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ISOFLURANE REQUIREMENTS; BISPECTRAL INDEX; DOSE REQUIREMENT; PREMEDICATION;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0000000000002882
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Dexmedetomidine is a sedative with modest analgesic efficacy, whereas remifentanil is an opioid analgesic with modest sedative potency. Synergy is often observed when sedative-hypnotics are combined with opioid analgesics in anesthetic practice. A three-phase crossover trial was conducted to study the pharmacodynamic interaction between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. Methods: After institutional review board approval, 30 age- and sex-stratified healthy volunteers were studied. The subjects received consecutive stepwise increasing target-controlled infusions of dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, and remifentanil with a fixed dexmedetomidine background concentration. Drug effects were measured using binary (yes or no) endpoints: no response to calling the subject by name, tolerance of shaking the patient while shouting the name ("shake and shout"), tolerance of deep trapezius squeeze, and tolerance of laryngoscopy. The drug effect was measured using the electroencephalogram-derived "Patient State Index." Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling related the administered dexmedetomidine and remifentanil concentration to these observed effects. Results: The binary endpoints were correlated with dexmedetomidine concentrations, with increasing concentrations required for increasing stimulus intensity. Estimated model parameters for the dexmedetomidine EC50 were 2.1 [90% CI, 1.6 to 2.8], 9.2 [6.8 to 13], 24 [16 to 35], and 35 [23 to 56] ng/ml, respectively. Age was inversely correlated with dexmedetomidine EC50 for all four stimuli. Adding remifentanil did not increase the probability of tolerance of any of the stimuli. The cerebral drug effect as measured by the Patient State Index was best described by the Hierarchical interaction model with an estimated dexmedetomidine EC50 of 0.49 [0.20 to 0.99] ng/ml and remifentanil EC50 of 1.6 [0.87 to 2.7] ng/ml. Conclusions: Low dexmedetomidine concentrations (EC50 of 0.49 ng/ml) are required to induce sedation as measured by the Patient State Index. Sensitivity to dexmedetomidine increases with age. Despite falling asleep, the majority of subjects remained arousable by calling the subject's name, "shake and shout," or a trapezius squeeze, even when reaching supraclinical concentrations. Adding remifentanil does not alter the likelihood of response to graded stimuli.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1017
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE, AN ALPHA2-ADRENOCEPTOR AGONIST, AND MIDAZOLAM AS IM PREMEDICATION FOR MINOR GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY [J].
AANTAA, R ;
JAAKOLA, ML ;
KALLIO, A ;
KANTO, J ;
SCHEININ, M ;
VUORINEN, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (04) :402-409
[2]   Reduction of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane by dexmedetomidine [J].
Aantaa, R ;
Jaakola, ML ;
Kallio, A ;
Kanto, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (05) :1055-1060
[3]   INTRAMUSCULAR DEXMEDETOMIDINE, A NOVEL ALPHA2-ADRENOCEPTOR AGONIST, AS PREMEDICATION FOR MINOR GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY [J].
AANTAA, R ;
KANTO, J ;
SCHEININ, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 35 (04) :283-288
[4]   THE EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUSLY ADMINISTERED DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON PERIOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMICS AND ISOFLURANE REQUIREMENTS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY [J].
AHO, M ;
LEHTINEN, AM ;
ERKOLA, O ;
KALLIO, A ;
KORTTILA, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1991, 74 (06) :997-1002
[5]   Comparative analgesic and mental effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine and alfentanil in humans [J].
Angst, MS ;
Ramaswamy, B ;
Davies, MF ;
Maze, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (03) :744-752
[6]   EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN HUMANS .2. HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES [J].
BLOOR, BC ;
WARD, DS ;
BELLEVILLE, JP ;
MAZE, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (06) :1134-1142
[7]  
Bol CJJG, 2000, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V294, P347
[8]   Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy [J].
Bouillon, TW ;
Bruhn, J ;
Radulescu, L ;
Andresen, C ;
Shafer, TJ ;
Cohane, C ;
Shafer, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (06) :1353-1372
[9]  
BUHRER M, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V80, P1216
[10]   Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers: 2. Haemodynamic profile [J].
Colin, P. J. ;
Hannivoort, L. N. ;
Eleveld, D. J. ;
Reyntjens, K. M. E. M. ;
Absalom, A. R. ;
Vereecke, H. E. M. ;
Struys, M. M. R. F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (02) :211-220