Neurocognitive markers of cognitive impairment: Exploring the roles of speed and inconsistency

被引:167
作者
Dixon, Roger A.
Lentz, Tanya L.
Garrett, Douglas D.
MacDonald, Stuart W. S.
Strauss, Esther
Hultsch, David F.
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Psychol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Univ Victoria, Dept Psychol, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
[4] Karolinska Inst, Aging Res Ctr, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
cognitive aging; cognitive inconsistency; cognitive speed; mild cognitive impairment; neurocognitive resources;
D O I
10.1037/0894-4105.21.3.381
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A well-known challenge for research in the cognitive neuropsychology of aging is to distinguish between the deficits and changes associated with normal aging and those indicative of early cognitive impairment. In a series of 2 studies, the authors explored whether 2 neurocognitive markers, speed (mean level) and inconsistency (intraindividual variability), distinguished between age groups (64-73 and 74-90+ years) and cognitive status groups (nonimpaired, mildly impaired, and moderately impaired). Study 1 (n = 416) showed that both level and inconsistency distinguished between the age and 2 cognitive status (not impaired, mildly impaired) groups, with a modest tendency for inconsistency to predict group membership over and above mean level. Study 2 (n = 304) replicated these results but extended them because of the qualifying effects associated with the unique moderately impaired oldest group. Specifically, not only were the groups more firmly distinguished by both indicators of speed, but evidence for the differential contribution of performance inconsistency was stronger. Neurocognitive markers of speed and inconsistency may be leading indicators of emerging cognitive impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 399
页数:19
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   For debate: Is mild cognitive impairment a clinically useful concept? Introduction [J].
Ames, David .
INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2006, 18 (03) :393-394
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, WAIS R MANUAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Neuropsychology, DOI DOI 10.1037/0894-4105.8.3.316
[4]   Sensorimotor variables and forced expiratory volume as correlates of speed, accuracy, and variability in reaction time performance in late adulthood [J].
Anstey, KJ .
AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 1999, 6 (02) :84-95
[5]   Cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease:: A meta-analysis [J].
Bäckman, L ;
Jones, S ;
Berger, AK ;
Laukka, EJ ;
Small, BJ .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) :520-531
[6]   Intraindividual variability as a marker of neurological dysfunction: A comparison of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease [J].
Burton, CL ;
Strauss, E ;
Hultsch, DF ;
Moll, A ;
Hunter, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 28 (01) :67-83
[7]  
BURTON CL, IN PRESS AGING NEURO
[8]   Within-occasion intraindividual variability and preclinical diagnostic status: Is intraindividual variability an indicator of mild cognitive impairment? [J].
Christensen, H ;
Dear, KBG ;
Anstey, KJ ;
Parslow, RA ;
Sachdev, P ;
Jorm, AF .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 19 (03) :309-317
[9]   Sensitivity and specificity of neuropsychological tests for mild cognitive impairment, vascular cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease [J].
de Jager, CA ;
Hogervorst, E ;
Combrinck, M ;
Budge, MM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (06) :1039-1050
[10]   Mild cognitive impairment: prevalence, prognosis, aetiology, and treatment [J].
DeCarli, C .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2003, 2 (01) :15-21