(D+10) MELD as a novel predictor of patient and graft survival after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation

被引:9
作者
Soin, Arvinder Singh [1 ]
Goja, Sanjay [1 ]
Yadav, Sanjay Kumar [1 ]
Tamang, Tseten Yonjen [1 ]
Rastogi, Amit [1 ]
Bhangui, Prashant [1 ]
Thiagrajan, Srinivasan [1 ]
Raut, Vikram [1 ]
Babu, Raghvendra Y. [1 ]
Saigal, Sanjiv [1 ]
Saraf, Neeraj [1 ]
Choudhary, Narendra Singh [1 ]
Vohara, Vijay [1 ]
机构
[1] Medanta Medic, Medanta Inst Liver Transplantat & Regenerat Med, Gurgaon, India
关键词
cirrhosis; donor; liver; MELD; transplantation; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; RECIPIENT AGE GRADIENT; ELDERLY DONORS; UNITED-STATES; DISEASE MELD; RISK-INDEX; SHORT-TERM; SIZE; REGENERATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.12939
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We modified the previously described D-MELD score in deceased donor liver transplant, to (D+10) MELD to account for living donors being about 10 years younger than deceased donors, and tested it on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. Five hundred consecutive LDLT, between July 2010 and December 2012, were retrospectively analyzed to see the effect of (D+10) MELD on patient and graft survival. Donor age alone did not influence survival. Recipients were divided into six classes based on the (D+10) MELD score: Class 1 (0-399), Class 2 (400-799), Class 3 (800-1199), Class 4 (1200-1599), Class 5 (1600-1999), and Class 6 (>2000). The 1 year patient survival (97.1, 88.8, 87.6, 76.9, and 75% across Class 1-5, P=.03) and graft survival (97.1, 87.9, 82.3, 76.9, and 75%; P=.04) was significantly different among the classes. The study population was divided into two groups at (D+10) MELD cut off at 860. Group 1 had a significantly better 1 year patient (90.4% vs 83.4%; P=.02) and graft survival (88.6% vs 80.2%; P=.01). While donor age alone does not predict recipient outcome, (D+10) MELD score is a strong predictor of recipient and graft survival, and may help in better recipient/donor selection and matching in LDLT.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[41]   Segment IV Preserving Middle Hepatic Vein Retrieval in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation [J].
Soin, Arvinder Singh ;
Mohanka, Ravi ;
Singla, Punit ;
Piplani, Tarun ;
Menon, Balachandran ;
Kakodkar, Rahul ;
Rastogi, Amit ;
Goja, Sanjay ;
Kumaran, Vinay ;
Nundy, Samiran .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 213 (02) :E5-E16
[42]   The role of Kupffer cells in liver regeneration [J].
Takeishi, T ;
Hirano, K ;
Kobayashi, T ;
Hasegawa, G ;
Hatakeyama, K ;
Naito, M .
ARCHIVES OF HISTOLOGY AND CYTOLOGY, 1999, 62 (05) :413-422
[43]   Liver Regeneration after Liver Transplantation [J].
Taki-Eldin, A. ;
Zhou, L. ;
Xie, H. -Y. ;
Zheng, S. -S. .
EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 48 (03) :139-153
[44]   Graft and patient survival after adult live donor liver transplantation compared to a matched cohort who received a deceased donor transplantation [J].
Thuluvath, PJ ;
Yoo, HY .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (10) :1263-1268
[45]   Donor-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Donor-Recipient Matching in Liver Transplantation [J].
Vitale, A. ;
Morales, R. Ramirez ;
dalla Bona, E. ;
Scopelliti, M. ;
Zanus, G. ;
Neri, D. ;
d'Amico, F. ;
Gringeri, E. ;
Russo, F. ;
Burra, P. ;
Angeli, P. ;
Cillo, U. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 43 (04) :974-976
[46]  
Warren Alessandra, 2011, Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res, V2011, P439835, DOI 10.1155/2011/439835
[47]   Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers [J].
Wiesner, R ;
Edwards, E ;
Freeman, R ;
Harper, A ;
Kim, R ;
Kamath, P ;
Kremers, W ;
Lake, J ;
Howard, T ;
Merion, RM ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Krom, R .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (01) :91-96
[48]   Graft size, donor age, and patient status are the indicators of early graft function after living donor liver transplantation [J].
Yoshizumi, Tomoharu ;
Taketomi, Akinobu ;
Uchiyama, Hideaki ;
Harada, Noboru ;
Kayashima, Hiroto ;
Yamashita, Yo-Ichi ;
Soejima, Yuji ;
Shimada, Mitsuo ;
Maehara, Yoshihiko .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 14 (07) :1007-1013