Glycemic control metrics using flash glucose monitoring and hospital complications in patients with COVID-19

被引:16
|
作者
Gomez, Ana Maria [1 ,2 ]
Henao, Diana Cristina [1 ,2 ]
Munoz, Oscar Mauricio [1 ,3 ]
Aschner, Pablo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Yepes, Carlos Augusto [1 ,2 ]
Jojoa, Ruby [1 ,2 ]
Kerguelen, Alfonso [1 ,2 ]
Parra, Dario [1 ,2 ]
Jaramillo, Pablo [1 ,2 ]
Umpierrez, Guillermo E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
[2] Hosp Univ San Ignacio, Endocrinol Unit, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Hosp Univ San Ignacio, Dept Internal Med, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Bogota, Colombia
[5] Emory Univ, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
Basal bolus; Flash glucose monitoring; COVID-19; Type; 2; diabetes; Inpatient; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.dsx.2021.02.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Few studies have reported on the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the Covid-19 pandemic. We aimed to examine glycemic control metrics using flash glucose monitoring during insulin treatment and the clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: Prospective, single-center cohort of adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes or hyperglycemia and COVID-19 infection treated with basal bolus insulin regimen. Glycemic control was assessed with the use of intermittent Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring during the hospital stay. Outcome of interest were time in range [TIR], time above [TAR] and below [TBR] range, glycemic variability [coefficient of variation [% CV]), and differences in a composite of complications including ICU admission, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute kidney injury. Results: A total of 60 patients were included (44 known diabetes and 16 new onset hyperglycemia). In total 190,080 data points of CGM were available, of which 72.5% of values were within the target area [TIR (70-180 mg/dL)], 22% TAR (>180 mg/dL), and 3% were TBR (<70 mg/dL). During treatment, the coefficient of variation (% CV) was 30%. There were no association with TIR, but patients with TAR >180 mg/dl had higher rates of a composite of complications (22.5% vs 16%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Basal bolus insulin regimen was safe and effective in achieving inpatient glycemic control in most patients with COVID-19. The association between TAR and complications indicates the need for improved inpatient glycemic control in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. (C) 2021 Diabetes India. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 503
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flash glucose monitoring and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes with subcutaneous insulin infusion flash glucose monitoring and glycemic control
    Pinheiro, Sara Lomelino
    Bastos, Margarida
    Barros, Luisa
    Melo, Miguel
    Paiva, Isabel
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2022, 59 (04) : 509 - 515
  • [2] Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes
    Fernandez, Elsa
    Cortazar, Alicia
    Bellido, Virginia
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 166
  • [3] Digitally enabled flash glucose monitoring for inpatients with COVID-19: Feasibility and pilot implementation in a teaching NHS Hospital in the UK
    Robbins, Tim
    Hopper, Adam
    Brophy, Jack
    Pearson, Elle
    Suthantirakumar, Risheka
    Vankad, Maariyah
    Igharo, Natalie
    Baitule, Sud
    Clark, Cain C. T.
    Arvanitis, Theodoros N.
    Sankar, Sailesh
    Kyrou, Ioannis
    Randeva, Harpal
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 8
  • [4] Glycemic Control Assessed by Intermittently Scanned Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Austria
    Secco, Katharina
    Baumann, Petra Martina
    Poettler, Tina
    Aberer, Felix
    Cigler, Monika
    Elsayed, Hesham
    Harer, Clemens Martin
    Weitgasser, Raimund
    Schuetz-Fuhrmann, Ingrid
    Mader, Julia Katharina
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (14)
  • [5] Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital: Emergent Considerations for Remote Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Galindo, Rodolfo J.
    Aleppo, Grazia
    Klonoff, David C.
    Spanakis, Elias K.
    Agarwal, Shivani
    Vellanki, Priya
    Olson, Darin E.
    Umpierrez, Guillermo E.
    Davis, Georgia M.
    Pasquel, Francisco J.
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 14 (04): : 822 - 832
  • [6] Glycemic control using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes requiring methylprednisolone therapy for severe COVID-19
    Uchihara, Masaki
    Kodani, Noriko
    Bouchi, Ryotaro
    Saito, Sho
    Miyazato, Yusuke
    Sugimoto, Hirofumi
    Umamoto, Kotaro
    Kobayashi, Michi
    Ihana-Sugiyama, Noriko
    Ohsugi, Mitsuru
    Tanabe, Akiyo
    Ueki, Kohjiro
    Takasaki, Jin
    Hojo, Masayuki
    Kajio, Hiroshi
    GLOBAL HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2022, 4 (06): : 336 - 340
  • [7] Diabetic patients with COVID-19 need more attention and better glycemic control
    Xu, Ming
    Yang, Wen
    Huang, Tao
    Zhou, Jun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2020, 11 (12) : 644 - 653
  • [8] Lessons learned from the continuous glucose monitoring metrics in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes under COVID-19 lockdown
    Brener, Avivit
    Mazor-Aronovitch, Kineret
    Rachmiel, Marianna
    Levek, Noa
    Barash, Galia
    Pinhas-Hamiel, Orit
    Lebenthal, Yael
    Landau, Zohar
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2020, 57 (12) : 1511 - 1517
  • [9] Factors influencing the effectiveness of using flash glucose monitoring on glycemic control for type 1 diabetes in Saudi Arabia
    Alhodaib, Hala Ibrahim
    Alsulihem, Sama
    WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2021, 12 (11)
  • [10] Glucose control in home-isolated adults with type 1 diabetes affected by COVID-19 using continuous glucose monitoring
    Longo, M.
    Scappaticcio, L.
    Petrizzo, M.
    Castaldo, F.
    Sarnataro, A.
    Forestiere, D.
    Caiazzo, F.
    Bellastella, G.
    Maiorino, M., I
    Capuano, A.
    Esposito, K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION, 2022, 45 (02) : 445 - 452