Going off grid: computationally efficient inference for log-Gaussian Cox processes

被引:118
作者
Simpson, D. [1 ]
Illian, J. B. [2 ]
Lindgren, F. [3 ]
Sorbye, S. H. [4 ]
Rue, H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Math Sci, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ St Andrews, Ctr Res Ecol & Environm Modelling, St Andrews KY16 9LZ, Fife, Scotland
[3] Univ Bath, Dept Math Sci, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[4] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Math & Stat, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
[5] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Math Sci, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Approximation of Gaussian random fields; Gaussian Markov random field; Integrated nested Laplace approximation; Spatial point process; Stochastic partial differential equation; INVERSE PROBLEMS; APPROXIMATION; MODELS; DISTRIBUTIONS; DIVERSITY; PATTERNS; FIELDS;
D O I
10.1093/biomet/asv064
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a new method for performing computational inference on log-Gaussian Cox processes. The likelihood is approximated directly by making use of a continuously specified Gaussian random field. We show that for sufficiently smooth Gaussian random field prior distributions, the approximation can converge with arbitrarily high order, whereas an approximation based on a counting process on a partition of the domain achieves only first-order convergence. The results improve upon the general theory of convergence for stochastic partial differential equation models introduced by Lindgren et al. (2011). The new method is demonstrated on a standard point pattern dataset, and two interesting extensions to the classical log-Gaussian Cox process framework are discussed. The first extension considers variable sampling effort throughout the observation window and implements the method of Chakraborty et al. (2011). The second extension constructs a log-Gaussian Cox process on the world's oceans. The analysis is performed using integrated nested Laplace approximation for fast approximate inference.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 70
页数:22
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns
[2]   Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns [J].
Baddeley, A ;
Turner, R .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2000, 42 (03) :283-315
[3]   Stationary process approximation for the analysis of large spatial datasets [J].
Banerjee, Sudipto ;
Gelfand, Alan E. ;
Finley, Andrew O. ;
Sang, Huiyan .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2008, 70 :825-848
[4]  
Belgacem F. B., 2001, Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, V12
[5]  
Blangiardo M, 2015, SPATIAL AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL BAYESIAN MODELS WITH R-INLA, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118950203
[6]  
Bogachev V.I., 2007, Measure Theory, VII, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-34514-5, 10.1007/978-3-540-34514-5]
[7]   Excursion and contour uncertainty regions for latent Gaussian models [J].
Bolin, David ;
Lindgren, Finn .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2015, 77 (01) :85-106
[8]   Spatial Matern Fields Driven by Non-Gaussian Noise [J].
Bolin, David .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2014, 41 (03) :557-579
[9]   A comparison between Markov approximations and other methods for large spatial data sets [J].
Bolin, David ;
Lindgren, Finn .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2013, 61 :7-21
[10]  
Bourdaud G., 2011, RIMS Kokyuroku Bessatsu B, VB26, P93