Coal Permeability Evolution and Gas Migration Under Non-equilibrium State

被引:77
作者
Liu, Ting [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Baiquan [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zhai, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Tong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Coal Methane & Fire Control, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Safety Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
关键词
Coalbed methane; Coal permeability; Coal-gas interaction; Non-equilibrium state; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; METHANE; MODEL; IMPACT; CBM; CO2-ECBM; STRESS; STRAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s11242-017-0862-8
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Laboratory test of coal permeability is generally conducted under the condition of gas adsorption equilibrium, and the results contribute to an understanding of gas migration in the original coal seams. However, gas flow under the state of non-equilibrium, accompanied by gas adsorption and desorption, is more common in coalbed methane (CBM) recovery and geological sequestration sites. Therefore, research on gas migration under the non-equilibrium state has a greater significance with regard to CBM recovery and geological sequestration. However, most permeability models, in which only one gas pressure has been considered, cannot be used to study gas flow under the non-equilibrium state. In this study, a new mathematical model, which includes both fracture gas pressure and matrix gas pressure, and couples the gas flow with the coal deformation, has been developed and verified. With the developed model, the spatial and temporal evolution of gas flow field during gas adsorption and desorption phases has been explored. The results show that the gas pressures present nonlinear distributions in the coal core, and the matrix gas pressure is generally lower than the fracture gas pressure during adsorption, but higher than the fracture gas pressure during desorption. For gas flow during adsorption, the main factor controlling permeability varies at different points. At the initial time, the permeability is dominated by the effective stress, and at the later time, the permeability in the part close to the gas inlet is mainly controlled by the matrix swelling, whereas that in the part close to the gas outlet is still dominated by the effective stress. For gas flow during desorption, from the gas inlet to the gas outlet, the permeability deceases at the initial time, and when the time is greater than 10,000 s, it shows a decreasing and then an increasing trend. The reason is that at the initial time, the permeability is dominated by the increased effective stress caused by the sharp decrease of the fracture gas pressure. Later, desorption of the adsorbed gas results in matrix shrinkage, which further leads to an increase of the permeability.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 416
页数:24
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Multiscale model reduction for shale gas transport in fractured media [J].
Akkutlu, I. Y. ;
Efendiev, Yalchin ;
Vasilyeva, Maria .
COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 20 (05) :953-973
[2]   The correlation between coal swelling and permeability during CO2 sequestration: A case study using Kushiro low rank coals [J].
Anggara, Ferian ;
Sasaki, Kyuro ;
Sugai, Yuichi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2016, 166 :62-70
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, SPE Reservoir Engineering (society of Petroleum Engineers), DOI DOI 10.2118/52607-PA
[4]   CBM and CO2-ECBM related sorption processes in coal: A review [J].
Busch, Andreas ;
Gensterblum, Yves .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2011, 87 (02) :49-71
[5]   Influence of the effective stress coefficient and sorption-induced strain on the evolution of coal permeability: Model development and analysis [J].
Chen, Zhongwei ;
Liu, Jishan ;
Pan, Zhejun ;
Connell, Luke D. ;
Elsworth, Derek .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 8 :101-110
[6]   A new interpretation of the response of coal permeability to changes in pore pressure, stress and matrix shrinkage [J].
Connell, L. D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2016, 162 :169-182
[7]   Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams [J].
Cui, XJ ;
Bustin, RM .
AAPG BULLETIN, 2005, 89 (09) :1181-1202
[8]  
Detournay E, 1993, COMPREHENSIVE ROCK E, V2, P13
[9]   CO2-ECBM: A Review of its Status and Global Potential [J].
Godec, Michael ;
Koperna, George ;
Gale, John .
12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 :5858-5869
[10]  
Gray I., 1987, RESERVOIR ENG COAL S, P28, DOI DOI 10.2118/12514-PA