Clinical significance of multi-slice spiral CT, MRI combined with gastric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of T staging of gastric cancer

被引:33
作者
Gai, Q. -Z. [1 ]
Li, X. -L. [2 ]
Li, N. [3 ]
Li, L. [4 ]
Meng, Z. [5 ]
Chen, A. -F. [6 ]
机构
[1] Yantaishan Hosp, Dept Imaging, Yantai 264000, Peoples R China
[2] Liaocheng Peoples Hosp, Dongchangfu Peoples Hosp, Image Ctr, Liaocheng 252000, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Affiliated Qingdao Cent Hosp, ICU, Qingdao 266000, Peoples R China
[4] Zhangqiu Dist Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Jinan 250200, Peoples R China
[5] Zhangqiu Dist Peoples Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Jinan 250200, Peoples R China
[6] Qingdao Municipal Hosp, East Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, 5 Donghai Middle Rd, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; Gastric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; Multi-slice spiral CT; Magnetic resonance imaging; Combined diagnosis;
D O I
10.1007/s12094-021-02606-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To explore the application value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with gastric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of T staging of gastric cancer. Methods The subjects of study were 109 gastric cancer patients with T stages admitted to our hospital for diagnosis and treatment from December 2016 to December 2018. All the patients were examined with MSCT, MRI and gastric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography before operation to observe corresponding imaging results. T staging of gastric cancer patients was conducted according to the examination results, which was then compared with postoperative pathological staging. It was performed to analyze the accuracy of the three diagnostic methods and combined diagnosis of gastric cancer T staging. Results The sensitivity of MSCT in the diagnosis of T staging of gastric cancer was 60.00%, 67.74%, 72.22%, 76.47%, the specificity was 95.24%, 88.46%, 86.30%, 94.56% and the diagnostic coincidence rate was 87.16%, 82.57%, 81.65%, 91.74%; the sensitivity of MRI in the diagnosis of T staging of gastric cancer was 68.00%, 70.97%, 77.78%, 76.47%, the specificity was 92.86%, 88.46%, 91.78%, 95.65%, and the diagnostic coincidence rate was 87.16%, 83.49%, 87.16%, 92.66%; the sensitivity of gastric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of T staging of gastric cancer was 80.00%, 83.87%, 86.11%, 82.35%, the specificity was 97.62%, 92.31%, 91.78%, 97.83%, and the diagnostic coincidence rate was 93.58%, 89.91%, 89.91%, 95.41%; the sensitivity of combined MSCT, MRI and gastric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of T staging of gastric cancer was 88.00%, 93.55%, 97.22%, 94.12%; the specificity was 100%, 97.44%, 95.89%, 98.91%; and the diagnostic coincidence rate was 97.25%, 96.33%, 96.33%, 98.17%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic coincidence rate of combined detection of the three methods were significantly higher than those of single detection (P < 0.05). Conclusion Combined use of MSCT, MRI and gastric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can significantly improve the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic coincidence rate of T staging of gastric cancer. It may provide a certain reference value for guiding the selection of clinical therapeutic approaches and evaluation of curative effect.
引用
收藏
页码:2036 / 2045
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography assessment of gastric cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Ang, Jian ;
Hu, Liang ;
Huang, Pin-Tong ;
Wu, Jin-Xiu ;
Huang, Ling-Na ;
Cao, Chun-Hui ;
Zheng, Yi-Xiong ;
Chen, Li .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (47) :7026-7032
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, AJCC Cancer staging manual
[3]  
Arocena MG, 2006, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V98, P582
[4]   Contribution of diffusion weighted MRI to diagnosis and staging in gastric tumors and comparison with multi-detector computed tomography [J].
Arslan, Harun ;
Ozbay, Mehmet Fatih ;
Calli, Iskan ;
Dogan, Erkan ;
Celik, Sebahattin ;
Batur, Abdussamet ;
Bora, Aydin ;
Yavuz, Alpaslan ;
Bulut, Mehmet Deniz ;
Ozgokce, Mesut ;
Kotan, Mehmet Cetin .
RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 51 (01) :23-29
[5]   Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings. A prospective study of 107 cases [J].
D'Elia, F ;
Zingarelli, A ;
Palli, D ;
Grani, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (12) :1877-1885
[6]   Diagnosis of the Invasion Depth of Gastric Cancer Using MDCT With Virtual Gastroscopy: Comparison With Staging With Endoscopic Ultrasound [J].
Furukawa, Kazuhiro ;
Miyahara, Ryoji ;
Itoh, Akihiro ;
Ohmiya, Naoki ;
Hirooka, Yoshiki ;
Mori, Kensaku ;
Goto, Hidemi .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (04) :867-875
[7]   Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: Comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US [J].
Habermann, CR ;
Weiss, F ;
Riecken, R ;
Honarpisheh, H ;
Bohnacker, S ;
Staedtler, C ;
Dieckmann, C ;
Schoder, V ;
Adam, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (02) :465-471
[8]   Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response [J].
Hallinan, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy ;
Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur .
CANCER IMAGING, 2013, 13 (02) :212-227
[9]   Clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer and postoperative pathological diagnosis [J].
Huo, Xianying ;
Yuan, Kuangsheng ;
Shen, Yuexia ;
Li, Min ;
Wang, Qi ;
Xing, Lingxiao ;
Shi, Gaofeng .
ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 8 (01) :275-280
[10]   Preoperative staging of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector-row computed tomography [J].
Hwang, Sung Wook ;
Lee, Dong Ho ;
Lee, Sang Hyub ;
Park, Young Soo ;
Hwang, Jin Hyeok ;
Kim, Jin Wook ;
Jung, Sook Hyang ;
Kim, Na Young ;
Kim, Young Hoon ;
Lee, Kyoung Ho ;
Kim, Hyung-Ho ;
Park, Do Joong ;
Lee, Hye Seung ;
Jung, Hyun Chae ;
Song, In Sung .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 25 (03) :512-518