Inclusion of Solvation and Entropy in the Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions

被引:96
作者
Huang, Sheng-You
Zou, Xiaoqin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Phys & Astron, Dept Biochem, Dalton Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
BINDING FREE-ENERGY; DE-NOVO DESIGN; FORCE-FIELD; MEAN FORCE; STATISTICAL POTENTIALS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; AUTOMATED DOCKING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; FLEXIBLE DOCKING; PDBBIND DATABASE;
D O I
10.1021/ci9002987
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The effects of solvation and entropy play a critical role in determining the binding free energy in protein-ligand interactions. Despite the good balance between speed and accuracy, no current knowledge-based scoring functions account for the effects of solvation and configurational entropy explicitly due to the difficulty in deriving the corresponding pair potentials and the resulting double counting problem. In the present work, we have included the solvation effect and configurational entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function by an iterative method. The newly developed scoring function has yielded a success rate of 91% in identifying near-native binding modes with Wang et al.'s benchmark of 100 diverse protein-ligand complexes. The results have been compared with the results of 15 other scoring functions for validation purpose. In binding affinity prediction, our scoring function has yielded a correlation of R-2 = 0.76 between the predicted binding scores and the experimentally measured binding affinities oil the PMF validation sets of 77 diverse complexes. The results have been compared with R-2 of four other well-known knowledge-based scoring functions. Finally, our scoring function was also validated on the large PDBbind database of 1299 protein-ligand complexes and yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.474. The present computational model can be applied to other scoring functions to account for solvation and entropic effects.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 273
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
*ACC INC, CERIUS2 VERS 4 6
[2]   Computational methods to predict binding free energy in ligand-receptor complexes [J].
Ajay ;
Murcko, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 38 (26) :4953-4967
[3]   Determination of the interaction potential from the pair distribution function: An inverse Monte Carlo technique [J].
Almarza, NG ;
Lomba, E .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2003, 68 (01) :6
[4]   Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome [J].
Baker, NA ;
Sept, D ;
Joseph, S ;
Holst, MJ ;
McCammon, JA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (18) :10037-10041
[5]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[6]   The use of scoring functions in drug discovery applications [J].
Böhm, HJ ;
Stahl, M .
REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 18, 2002, 18 :41-87
[7]   Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: A fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs [J].
Bohm, HJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1998, 12 (04) :309-323
[9]   Molecular recognition and docking algorithms [J].
Brooijmans, N ;
Kuntz, ID .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS AND BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE, 2003, 32 :335-373
[10]   Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding [J].
Chang, Chia-en A. ;
Chen, Wei ;
Gilson, Michael K. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (05) :1534-1539