Sustainability efficiency assessment of listed companies in China: a super-efficiency SBM-DEA model considering undesirable output

被引:33
作者
Jiang, Tingting [1 ]
Zhang, Yalan [1 ]
Jin, Qiang [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Inst Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 200235, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Solid Waste Treatment & Res, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Corporate sustainability; Efficiency assessment; Chinese listed companies; Data envelopment analysis; Sensitivity analyses; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS; ECO-EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; FIRMS; SLACKS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-13997-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Chinese listed companies play a vital role in national economy, which has contributed more than half of the gross domestic product. But the environmental pollution existed in the production and operation of companies has been ignored, so an objective and comprehensive efficiency assessment of Chinese listed companies were urgent. This paper constructed an index system based on green perspective, employed a super-efficiency slacks-based measure DEA (SBM-DEA) model considering undesirable outputs to assess the sustainability efficiency of Chinese listed companies. The results indicated that (1) the green sustainability efficiency of listed companies needed to be greatly improved. The average efficiency score of samples was 0.461 over 3 years, so the improvement potential was about 53.9%, only 23 companies were relatively effective. (2) The sustainability efficiency of companies has shown a slow upward trend in volatility since 2017, the non-daily consumer goods sector was the most efficient, while utilities were relatively inefficient. (3) When efficient and inefficient companies were compared, the latter were found to have significant input surplus, especially in water consumption. (4) The analysis of sensitivity on inputs and outputs showed that attention should be paid to water consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. (5) Spearman non-parametric test verified that company size and debt-paying ability were the implicit factors affecting company sustainability efficiency. The results of performance evaluation can not only provide a potential reference for the operation and management of listed companies in China, but also have guiding significance for local governments to strengthen the supervision of companies.
引用
收藏
页码:47588 / 47604
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Regulations of the Peoples Republic of China on Value-Added Tax
[2]   Ranking Corporations Based on Sustainable and Socially Responsible Practices. A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach [J].
Belu, Constantin .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 17 (04) :257-268
[3]   Eco-efficiency analysis of French firms: a data envelopment analysis approach [J].
Lahouel B.B. .
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2016, 18 (3) :395-416
[4]  
Cai SB, 2015, ADV EDUC RES, V81, P137
[5]   The influence of the operational environment on the efficiency of water utilities [J].
Carvalho, Pedro ;
Marques, Rui Cunha .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (10) :2698-2707
[6]   Efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants: A data envelopment analysis approach integrating technical, economic, and environmental issues [J].
Castellet, Lledo ;
Molinos-Senante, Maria .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 167 :160-166
[7]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[8]  
Chen X, 2008, EC RE SHANGHAI, P88, DOI [10.19626/j.cnki.cn31-1163/f.2008.05.015, DOI 10.19626/J.CNKI.CN31-1163/F.2008.05.015]
[9]   Ef ficiency assessment of rural domestic sewage treatment facilities by a slacked -based DEA model [J].
Cheng, Panpan ;
Jin, Qiang ;
Jiang, Hui ;
Hua, Ming ;
Ye, Zhen .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 267
[10]  
Chien LQ, 2017, INT CONF SYST SCI EN, P625, DOI 10.1109/ICSSE.2017.8030950