Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Integrated Screw Cages: Intrinsic Load Generation, Subsidence, and Torsional Stability

被引:6
作者
Assem, Yusuf [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Pelletier, Matthew H. [2 ]
Mobbs, Ralph J. [3 ,4 ]
Phan, Kevin [3 ,4 ]
Walsh, William R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Kensington, NSW, Australia
[2] UNSW, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Surg & Orthopaed Res Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] NeuroSpine Surg Res Grp NSURG, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Prince Wales Private Hosp, Neurospine Clin, Randwick, NSW, Australia
关键词
ALIF; Fusion; Integrated; Stability; Stand-alone; STAND-ALONE ANTERIOR; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; FIXATION; PLATE; DEVICE; INSTRUMENTATION; ARTHROPLASTY; BIOMECHANICS; CONSTRUCTS; DESIGNS;
D O I
10.1111/os.12283
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To perform a repeatable idealized in vitro model to evaluate the effects of key design features and integrated screw fixation on unloaded surface engagement, subsidence, and torsional stability. Methods: We evaluated four different stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cages with two, three, and four screw designs. Polyurethane (saw-bone) foam blocks were used to simulate the vertebral bone. Fuji Film was used to measure the contact footprint, average pressure, and load generated by fixating the cages with screws. Subsidence was tested by axially loading the constructs at 10 N/s to 400 N and torsional load was applied +/-1 Nm for 10 cycles to assess stability. Outcome measures included total subsidence and maximal torsional angle range. Results: Cages 1, 2, and 4 were symmetrical and produced similar results in terms of contact footprint, average pressure, and load. The addition of integrated screws into the cage-bone block construct demonstrated a clear trend towards decreased subsidence. Cage 2 with surface titanium angled ridges and a keel produced the greatest subsidence with and without screws, significantly more than all other cages (P < 0.05). Angular rotation was not significantly affected by the addition of screws (P < 0.066). A statistically significant correlation existed between subsidence and reduced angular rotation across all cage constructs (P = 0.018). Conclusion: Each stand-alone cage featured unique surface characteristics, which resulted in differing cage-foam interface engagement, influencing the subsidence and torsional angle. Increased subsidence significantly reduced the torsional angle across all cage constructs.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 197
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Stress analysis of interbody fusion-finite element modelling of intervertebral implant and vertebral body [J].
Adam, C ;
Pearcy, M ;
McCombe, P .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 18 (04) :265-272
[2]   A New Bone Surrogate Model for Testing Interbody Device Subsidence [J].
Au, Anthony G. ;
Aiyangar, Ameet K. ;
Anderson, Paul A. ;
Ploeg, Heidi-Lynn .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (16) :1289-1296
[3]   Evaluation of a Lumbar Intervertebral Spacer With Integrated Screws as a Stand-alone Fixation Device [J].
Beaubien, Brian P. ;
Freeman, Andrew L. ;
Turner, Joseph L. ;
Castro, Carlos A. ;
Armstrong, Will D. ;
Waugh, Lindsey G. ;
Dryer, Randall F. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2010, 23 (05) :351-358
[4]   Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 [J].
Behrbalk, Eyal ;
Uri, Ofir ;
Parks, Ruth M. ;
Musson, Rachel ;
Soh, Reuben Chee Cheong ;
Boszczyk, Bronek Maximilian .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (12) :2869-2875
[5]   Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics [J].
Buttermann, Glenn R. ;
Beaubien, Brian P. ;
Freeman, Andrew L. ;
Stoll, James E. ;
Chappuis, James L. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (07) :564-573
[6]   A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: Biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques [J].
Cain, CMJ ;
Schleicher, P ;
Gerlach, R ;
Pflugmacher, R ;
Scholz, M ;
Kandziora, F .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (23) :2631-2636
[7]   Biomechanical comparison of three stand-alone lumbar cages - a three-dimensional finite element analysis [J].
Chen, Shih-Hao ;
Chiang, Ming-Chieh ;
Lin, Jin-Fu ;
Lin, Shang-Chih ;
Hung, Ching-Hua .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
[8]   Comparison of cage designs for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A biomechanical study [J].
Cho, Woojin ;
Wu, Chunhui ;
Mehbod, Amir A. ;
Transfeldt, Ensor E. .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 23 (08) :979-985
[9]   Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages [J].
Choi, JY ;
Sung, KH .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (01) :16-22
[10]   Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation - a finite element analysis [J].
Choi, Kyung-Chul ;
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik ;
Lee, Sang-Ho ;
Kim, Yeong Hyeon ;
Lee, Sung Jae ;
Park, Chun-Kun .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14