Renoprotective Effect of the Combination of Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitor and Calcium Channel Blocker in Patients with Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease

被引:14
作者
Huang, Rong-Shuang [1 ]
Cheng, Yi-Ming [1 ]
Zeng, Xiao-Xi [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sehee [3 ]
Fu, Ping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Div Renal, Dept Internal Med, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Biostat & Cost Benefit Anal Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Calcium Channel Blocker; Chronic Kidney Disease; Hypertension; Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitor; Renoprotection; Therapy; BLOOD-PRESSURE; ACE-INHIBITOR; RENAL-DISEASE; PROTEINURIA; PROGRESSION; PROTECTION; ANTAGONIST; THERAPY; RISK;
D O I
10.4103/0366-6999.176987
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and calcium channel blocker (CCB) are widely used in controlling blood pressure (BP) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We carried out a meta-analysis to compare the renoprotective effect of the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and CCB (i.e., ACEI/ARB + CCB) with ACEI/ARB monotherapy in patients with hypertension and CKD. Methods: Publications were identified from PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of BP lowering treatment for patients with hypertension and CKD were considered. The outcomes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cardiovascular events, BP, urinary protein measures, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and adverse events were extracted. Results: Based on seven RCTs with 628 patients, ACEI/ARB + CCB did not show additional benefit for the incidence of ESRD (risk ratio [RR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.33) and cardiovascular events (RR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.21-1.63) significantly, compared with ACEI/ARB monotherapy. There were no significant differences in change from baseline to the end points in diastolic BP (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.28 mmHg; 95% CI: -3.18 to -0.62), proteinuria (standard mean difference = -0.55; 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.30), GFR (WMD = -0.32 ml/min; 95% CI: -1.53 to -0.89), and occurrence of adverse events (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.72-1.53). However, ACEI/ARB + CCB showed a greater reduction in systolic BP (WMD = -4.46 mmHg; 95% CI: -6.95 to -1.97), compared with ACEI/ARB monotherapy. Conclusion: ACEI/ARB + CCB had no additional renoprotective benefit beyond than what could be achieved with ACEI/ARB monotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 569
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, Americanjournal ofkidney diseases: the officialjournal ofthe National Kidney Foundation, V39, pS46, DOI DOI 10.1053/AJKD.2002.30943
  • [2] [Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [3] Effects of an ACE inhibitor calcium antagonist combination on proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy
    Bakris, GL
    Weir, MR
    DeQuattro, V
    McMahon, FG
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 54 (04) : 1283 - 1289
  • [4] Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Calcium Antagonists: a Synergistic Action for a Better Prevention of Cardiovascular Events
    Boutouyrie, Pierre
    [J]. THERAPIE, 2009, 64 (04): : 241 - 248
  • [5] Proteinuria as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality in older people: A prospective study
    Culleton, BF
    Larson, MG
    Parfrey, PS
    Kannel, WB
    Levy, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 109 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [6] Class differences in the effects of calcium channel blockers in the rat remnant kidney model
    Griffin, KA
    Picken, MM
    Bakris, GL
    Bidani, AK
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 55 (05) : 1849 - 1860
  • [7] Griffin Karen A, 2008, Curr Cardiol Rep, V10, P448
  • [8] The effects of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist on the progression of renal disease: the Nephros Study
    Herlitz, H
    Harris, K
    Risler, T
    Boner, G
    Bernheim, J
    Chanard, J
    Aurell, M
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 16 (11) : 2158 - 2165
  • [9] Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
    Higgins, JPT
    Thompson, SG
    Deeks, JJ
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414): : 557 - 560
  • [10] Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis:: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina, Tania B.
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio
    Botella, Juan
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 11 (02) : 193 - 206