Cochlear Nerve Action Potential Monitoring with the Microdissector in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

被引:15
作者
Aihara, Noritaka [1 ]
Murakami, Shingo [2 ]
Watanabe, Nobuhiro [2 ]
Takahashi, Mariko [2 ]
Inagaki, Akira [2 ]
Tanikawa, Motoki
Yamada, Kazuo
机构
[1] Nagoya City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Mizuho Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4678601, Japan
[2] Nagoya City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Nagoya, Aichi 4678601, Japan
来源
SKULL BASE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH | 2009年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
cochlear nerve action potential; microdissector; auditory brainstem response; vestibular schwannoma; ACOUSTIC NEUROMA SURGERY; COMPOUND ACTION-POTENTIALS; POSTERIOR-FOSSA SURGERY; BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE; HEARING PRESERVATION; FACIAL-NERVE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1055/s-0029-1220208
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We developed a cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) monitoring technique using a microdissector and compared the results of CNAP and auditory brainstem response (ABR) monitoring. Thirty-six patients underwent vestibular schwannoma resection via the retrosigmoid approach to preserve hearing. Both CNAP with the microdissector and surface ABR were recorded during the operation. We used the microdissector as an intracranial electrode for CNAP monitoring. The CNAP waveform was classified into four types: triphasic, biphasic, positive, and flat. At the completion of the tumor resection, the triphasic waveform was observed in 11 patients and the biphasic waveform was observed in 11 patients. Hearing function was preserved in all of them, although it was preserved in only two patients with other CNAP waveform types. The prognostic value of CNAP is significantly higher than that of ABR. We found that although CNAP with a microdissector does not provide real-time monitoring, with the classification of waveforms it can be used as predictable tool for postoperative hearing more accurately than ABR.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 332
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ABRAMSON M, 1985, LARYNGOSCOPE, V95, P1318
[2]  
Colletti V, 1998, AUDIOLOGY, V37, P27
[3]  
Colletti V, 1998, AM J OTOL, V19, P503
[4]   CHANGES IN DIRECTLY RECORDED COCHLEAR NERVE COMPOUND ACTION-POTENTIALS DURING ACOUSTIC TUMOR SURGERY [J].
COLLETTI, V ;
BRICOLO, A ;
FIORINO, FG ;
BRUNI, L .
SKULL BASE SURGERY, 1994, 4 (01) :1-9
[5]   A comparison of direct eighth nerve monitoring and auditory brainstem response in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma [J].
Danner, C ;
Mastrodimos, T ;
Cueva, RA .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2004, 25 (05) :826-832
[6]  
HOEHMANN D, 1991, AM J OTOL, V12, P172
[7]   Acoustic neuroma surgery: Use of cochlear nerve action potential monitoring for hearing preservation [J].
Jackson, LE ;
Roberson, JB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2000, 21 (02) :249-259
[8]   ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING DURING ACOUSTIC NEUROMA AND OTHER POSTERIOR-FOSSA SURGERY [J].
LINDEN, RD ;
TATOR, CH ;
BENEDICT, C ;
CHARLES, D ;
MRAZ, V ;
BELL, I .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1988, 15 (01) :73-81
[9]   COMPOUND ACTION-POTENTIALS RECORDED INTRACRANIALLY FROM THE AUDITORY-NERVE IN MAN [J].
MOLLER, AR ;
JANNETTA, PJ .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1981, 74 (03) :862-874
[10]   HEARING PRESERVATION IN ACOUSTIC NEUROMA SURGERY - VALUE OF MONITORING COCHLEAR NERVE ACTION-POTENTIALS [J].
NEDZELSKI, JM ;
CHIONG, CM ;
CASHMAN, MZ ;
STANTON, SG ;
ROWED, DW .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1994, 111 (06) :703-709