Proficiency-related variation in syntactic complexity: A study of English L1 and L2 oral descriptive discourse

被引:9
作者
Lambert, Craig [1 ]
Nakamura, Sachiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Kyushu Sangyo Univ, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
L2; development; L2 learner language analysis; proficiency; syntactic complexity; task-based language teaching; CONCRETENESS; ACQUISITION; ADOLESCENTS; LANGUAGE; CHILDREN; IMAGERY; UNIT; AGE; CAF; 2ND;
D O I
10.1111/ijal.12224
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This cross-sectional study compares the discourse of Japanese learners of English at different proficiency levels with their native English-speaking peers in completing six communication tasks in order to better understand the emergence of syntactic complexity in relationship to developing second language (L2) proficiency. The study investigates four clause combination strategies (coordination, nominal subordination, adverbial subordination, and relative subordination) in relationship to lexical selection and compensation strategies in order to gain insight into how and why syntactic complexity at the clausal and phrasal levels varied between groups. Results indicate that the four types of clause combination strategies investigated varied systematically with proficiency level as argued in previous theory and research and might be productively distinguished in future analysis of L2 learner language. The study also identifies how L2 noun phrase complexity was moderated by lexical compensation. The results of the study have important implications for the coding of syntactic complexity in L2 learner language.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 264
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   A 2ND LOOK AT T-UNIT ANALYSIS - RECONSIDERING THE SENTENCE [J].
BARDOVIHARLIG, K .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1992, 26 (02) :390-395
[2]   Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
Warriner, Amy Beth ;
Kuperman, Victor .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (03) :904-911
[3]  
Bybee J., 2008, HDB COGNITIVE LINGUI, P216
[4]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[5]   THE MRC PSYCHOLINGUISTIC DATABASE [J].
COLTHEART, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 33 (NOV) :497-505
[6]  
Council of Europe, 2001, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment
[7]   THE UTTERANCE, AND OTHER BASIC UNITS FOR 2ND LANGUAGE DISCOURSE ANALYSIS [J].
CROOKES, G .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 1990, 11 (02) :183-199
[8]   A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses [J].
Diessel, H ;
Tomasello, M .
LANGUAGE, 2005, 81 (04) :882-906
[9]   The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis [J].
Diessel, H ;
Tomasello, M .
COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, 2001, 12 (02) :97-141
[10]  
Diessel Holger, 2004, ACQUISITION COMPLEX, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511486531