Think Twice before Jumping on the Bandwagon: Clarifying Concepts in Research on the Bandwagon Effect

被引:42
作者
Barnfield, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, England
关键词
bandwagon effect; strategic voting; underdog effect; polls; PUBLIC-OPINION POLLS; CANDIDATE CHOICE; IMPACT; EXPECTATIONS; PREFERENCES; UNDERDOG; ELECTION; INFORMATION; MECHANISMS; VIABILITY;
D O I
10.1177/1478929919870691
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The potential influence of perceived popularity of political parties or candidates on individual vote choice is most commonly studied in terms of a 'bandwagon effect'. However, there is confusion over exactly what the bandwagon effect is. In this article, I seek to remedy this confusion by providing a clear definition and typology of bandwagon effects, grounded in a review which reappraises existing scholarship. I argue that the bandwagon effect is a distinct social phenomenon involving an individual-level change in vote choice or turnout decision towards a more or increasingly popular candidate or party, motivated initially by this popularity. I then break this down employing a typology which draws on distinctions made in the literature between static and dynamic, and conversion and mobilisation effects. This conception of the bandwagon effect leaves it open to the operation of a variety of possible underlying processes. Scholars should apply such clear concepts as are proposed here in bandwagon research, to situate and clarify their contributions theoretically and offer a more nuanced understanding of whether, how and why bandwagon effects occur across different political contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 574
页数:22
相关论文
共 109 条
[2]  
Abramowitz AlanI., 1987, POLIT BEHAV, V9, P49, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00987278
[3]   Analyzing Causal Mechanisms in Survey Experiments [J].
Acharya, Avidit ;
Blackwell, Matthew ;
Sen, Maya .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 26 (04) :357-378
[4]   WHAT MAKES VOTERS TURN OUT: THE EFFECTS OF POLLS AND BELIEFS [J].
Agranov, Marina ;
Goeree, Jacob K. ;
Romero, Julian ;
Yariv, Leeat .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2018, 16 (03) :825-856
[5]   A TEST OF PROPAGANDA VALUES IN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS [J].
Allard, Winston .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1941, 20 (02) :206-213
[6]   Strategic voting in British elections [J].
Alvarez, RM ;
Boehmke, FJ ;
Nagler, J .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2006, 25 (01) :1-19
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1944, The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign
[8]   OF HORSESHOES AND HORSE RACES - EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE IMPACT OF POLL RESULTS ON ELECTORAL-BEHAVIOR [J].
ANSOLABEHERE, S ;
IYENGAR, S .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 1994, 11 (04) :413-430
[9]  
Areni CS, 2000, PSYCHOL MARKET, V17, P855, DOI 10.1002/1520-6793(200010)17:10<855::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-V