Estimation of Crude Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure During CO2 Flooding: A Comparative Study of Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Back Propagation Neural Network

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Jin [1 ]
Zhang, Xiuqing [2 ]
Dong, Shaoyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Automat Res Inst, Lianyungang, Peoples R China
[2] China Telecom, Lianyungang Branch, Lianyungang, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 IEEE 5TH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ITOEC 2020) | 2020年
关键词
CO2; flooding; minimum miscibility pressure; random forest; support vector machine; back propagation neural network; ALTERNATING CONDITIONAL-EXPECTATION; VANISHING INTERFACIAL-TENSION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; REGRESSION TREES; PREDICTION; IMPURE; MODEL; RESERVOIR; PURE; MMP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
When CO2 is injected into hydrocarbon reservoirs for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), which defines as the lowest pressure of generating a miscible phase, is an important parameter to determine whether the displacement process is miscible flooding or not at reservoir conditions. Compared with the time-consuming and complicated measurement of MMP in the laboratory, an empirical estimation is a better alternative for engineering design of CO2 flooding, especially in the feasibility study stage. Machine learning based intelligent model exhibits superiority in convenient and rapid access to the precise estimations of MMP. In this paper, on the basis of experimental information from previous literature, three intelligent models, i.e., random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and back propagation neural network (BPNN), are presented to estimate the CO2 MMP with various crudes. Through multivariate parametric regression (MPR) method, six main influencing factors, i.e., the mole fraction of two injected gas components (C-2-C-5 , H2S), Tcm, Tr, MWC5+ and Vol/Int, are selected as input variables. Our results show that all three intelligent models are able to exploit intrinsic dependencies between MMP and these input variables. However, different intelligent models have their own features: (1) The RF model with strong robustness and generalization capability exhibits the best performance in total database among these three models. (2) The BPNN model with artificially optimized network structures is potentially comparable with other two models although the accuracy of BPNN is vulnerable to the initialized network parameters. (3) The SVM model occupies an obvious advantage in coping with sparse samples whose MMP is over 30 MPa.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 289
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Comparison of random forest, support vector machine and back propagation neural network for electronic tongue data classification: Application to the recognition of orange beverage and Chinese vinegar
    Liu, Miao
    Wang, Mingjun
    Wang, Jun
    Li, Duo
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2013, 177 : 970 - 980
  • [32] Oil-CO2 MMP Determination in Competition of Neural Network, Support Vector Regression, and Committee Machine
    Asoodeh, Mojtaba
    Gholami, Amin
    Bagheripour, Parisa
    JOURNAL OF DISPERSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 35 (04) : 564 - 571
  • [33] Modelling minimum miscibility pressure of CO2-crude oil systems using deep learning, tree-based, and thermodynamic models: Application to CO2 sequestration and enhanced oil recovery
    Lv, Qichao
    Zheng, Rong
    Guo, Xinshu
    Larestani, Aydin
    Hadavimoghaddam, Fahimeh
    Riazi, Masoud
    Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein
    Wang, Kai
    Li, Junjian
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 310
  • [34] A Comparative Study of Extreme Learning Machine, Least Squares Support Vector Machine, Back Propagation Neural Network for Outlet Total Phosphorus Prediction
    Yu, Tingting
    Bai, Yun
    2018 PROGNOSTICS AND SYSTEM HEALTH MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (PHM-CHONGQING 2018), 2018, : 717 - 722
  • [35] Use of hybrid-ANFIS and ensemble methods to calculate minimum miscibility pressure of CO2 - reservoir oil system in miscible flooding process
    Ghiasi, Mohammad M.
    Mohammadi, Amir H.
    Zendehboudi, Sohrab
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2021, 331
  • [36] A general regression neural network model offers reliable prediction of CO2 minimum miscibility pressure
    Alomair, Osamah A.
    Garrouch, Ali A.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 6 (03) : 351 - 365
  • [37] Molecular insight into minimum miscibility pressure estimation of shale oil/CO2 in organic nanopores using CO2 huff-n-puff
    Sun, Qian
    Bhusal, Aabiskar
    Zhang, Na
    Adhikari, Kapil
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2023, 280
  • [38] Estimation of minimum miscibility pressure of varied gas compositions and reservoir crude oil over a wide range of conditions using an artificial neural network model
    Choubineh A.
    Helalizadeh A.
    Wood D.A.
    Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2019, 3 (01): : 52 - 66
  • [39] Investigation of the performances of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and 3D-2D Convolutional Neural Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification
    Seyrek, Eren Can
    Uysal, Murat
    EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2024, 28 (02) : 161 - 174
  • [40] A study of waterborne diseases during flooding using Radarsat-2 imagery and a back propagation neural network algorithm
    Yomwan, Peera
    Cao, Chunxiang
    Rakwatin, Preesan
    Suphamitmongkol, Warawut
    Tian, Rong
    Saokarn, Apitach
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2015, 6 (04) : 289 - 307