How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy?

被引：13

作者：

Behaghel, Luc ^{[1
]}

Macours, Karen ^{[1
]}

Subervie, Julie ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] INRA, Paris Sch Econ, Paris, France

[2] Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier SupAgro, INRA,CEE M, Montpellier, France

来源：

EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2019年 / 46卷 / 03期

关键词：

Common agricultural policy; impact evaluation; policy design; field experiments; INDIVIDUAL FARM MODEL; FIELD EXPERIMENT; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SOCIAL NORMS; INFORMATION; AUCTIONS; CONSERVATION; PERFORMANCE; EDUCATION; PAYMENTS;

D O I：

10.1093/erae/jbz021

中图分类号：

F3 [农业经济];

学科分类号：

0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;

摘要：

We illustrate how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) could be used to evaluate the impact of alternative designs of the common agricultural policy (CAP). We select four policy-design issues which relate to different components of the CAP and raise a wide range of economic questions: nudges, coordination failures, equity-efficiency trade-offs, contract design. Based on examples from agricultural and social policies in developing and developed countries, we show that RCTs have provided useful rigorous evidence on similar design issues, suggesting that they could also be lever-aged to help improve components of the CAP.

引用

页码：473 / 493

页数：21

共 71 条

[1]

Athey Susan., 2017, HDB EC FIELD EXPT, P73, DOI DOI 10.1016/BS.HEFE.2016.10.003

[2] Getting Parents Involved: A Field Experiment in Deprived Schools [J].