Estimating Lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study

被引:20
作者
Bradley, Stephen H. [1 ]
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding [4 ]
Aslam, Rehima [6 ]
Bhartia, Bobby [4 ]
Callister, Matthew E. J. [5 ]
Kennedy, Martyn P. T. [5 ]
Mounce, Luke T. A. [7 ]
Shinkins, Bethany [3 ]
Hamilton, William T. [7 ]
Neal, Richard D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Primary Care Oncol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Test Evaluat Grp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Resp Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Calderdale Huddersfield NHS Trust, Resp Med, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ Exeter, Coll Med & Hlth, Primary Care Diagnost, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
chest x-ray; early diagnosis; general practice; lung cancer; primary care; radiograph;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp20X713993
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many countries but previous research has suggested that the disease is not detected by CXR in approximately 20% of patients. The risk of lung cancer, with particular symptoms, following a negative CXR is not known. Aim To establish the sensitivity and specificity of CXR requested by patients who are symptomatic; determine the positive predictive values (PPVs) of each presenting symptom of lung cancer following a negative CXR; and determine whether symptoms associated with lung cancer are different in those who had a positive CXR result compared with those who had a negative CXR result. Design and setting A prospective cohort study was conducted in Leeds, UK, based on routinely collected data from a service that allowed patients with symptoms or lung cancer to request CXR. Method Symptom data were combined with a diagnostic category (positive or negative) for each CXR, and the sensitivity and specificity of CXR for lung cancer were calculated. The PPV of lung cancer associated with each symptom or combination of symptoms was estimated for those patients with a negative CXR. Results In total, 114(1.3%) of 8996 patients who requested a CXR were diagnosed with lung cancer within 1 year. Sensitivity was 75.4% and specificity was 90.2%. The PPV of all symptoms fir a diagnosis of lung cancer within 1 year of CXR was <1% for all individual symptoms except for haemoptysis, which had a PPV of 2.9%. PPVs for a diagnosis of lung cancer within 2 years of CXR was <1.5% for all single symptoms except for haemoptysis, which had a PPV of 3.9%. Conclusion CXR has limited sensitivity; however, in a population with a low prevalence of lung caner, its high specificity and negative predictive value means that lung cancer is very unlikely to be present following a negative result. Findings also support guidance that unexplained haemoptysis warrants urgent referral, regardless of CXR result.
引用
收藏
页码:E280 / E286
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995-2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study
    Arnold, Melina
    Rutherford, Mark J.
    Bardot, Aude
    Ferlay, Jacques
    Andersson, Therese M-L
    Myklebust, Tor Age
    Tervonen, Hanna
    Thursfield, Vicky
    Ransom, David
    Shack, Lorraine
    Woods, Ryan R.
    Turner, Donna
    Leonfellner, Suzanne
    Ryan, Susan
    Saint-Jacques, Nathalie
    De, Prithwish
    McClure, Carol
    Ramanakumar, Agnihotram V.
    Stuart-Panko, Heather
    Engholm, Gerda
    Walsh, Paul M.
    Jackson, Christopher
    Vernon, Sally
    Morgan, Eileen
    Gavin, Anna
    Morrison, David S.
    Huws, Dyfed W.
    Porter, Geoff
    Butler, John
    Bryant, Heather
    Currow, David C.
    Hiom, Sara
    Parkin, D. Max
    Sasieni, Peter
    Lambert, Paul C.
    Moller, Bjorn
    Soerjomataram, Isabelle
    Bray, Freddie
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (11) : 1493 - 1505
  • [2] Clinical relevance of thrombocytosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study of cancer incidence using English electronic medical records and cancer registry data
    Bailey, Sarah E. R.
    Ukoumunne, Obioha C.
    Shephard, Elizabeth A.
    Hamilton, Willie
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2017, 67 (659) : E405 - E413
  • [3] Sensitivity of chest X-ray for detecting lung cancer in people presenting with symptoms: a systematic review
    Bradley, Stephen H.
    Abraham, Sarah
    Callister, Matthew E. J.
    Grice, Adam
    Hamilton, William T.
    Lopez, Rocio Rodriguez
    Shinkins, Bethany
    Neal, Richard D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (689) : E827 - E835
  • [4] Care Quality Commission, 2019, LEEDS TEACH HOSP NHS
  • [5] The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients
    Hamilton, W.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 : S80 - S86
  • [6] Identifying patients with suspected lung cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm
    Hippisley-Cox, Julia
    Coupand, Carol
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2011, 61 (592) : e715 - e723
  • [7] Using socio-demographic and early clinical features in general practice to identify people with lung cancer earlier
    Iyen-Omofoman, Barbara
    Tata, Laila J.
    Baldwin, David R.
    Smith, Chris J. P.
    Hubbard, Richard B.
    [J]. THORAX, 2013, 68 (05) : 451 - 459
  • [8] Lung cancer stage-shift following a symptom awareness campaign
    Kennedy, Martyn P. T.
    Cheyne, Leanne
    Darby, Michael
    Plant, Paul
    Milton, Richard
    Robson, Jonathan M.
    Gill, Alison
    Malhotra, Puneet
    Ashford-Turner, Victoria
    Rodger, Kirsty
    Paramasivam, Elankumaran
    Johnstone, Annette
    Bhartia, Bobby
    Karthik, Shishir
    Foster, Catherine
    Lovatt, Veronica
    Hewitt, Francesca
    Cresswell, Louise
    Coupland, Victoria H.
    Luchtenborg, Margreet
    Jack, Ruth H.
    Moller, Henrik
    Callister, Matthew E. J.
    [J]. THORAX, 2018, 73 (12) : 1128 - 1136
  • [9] Interval lung cancers not detected on screening chest X-rays: How are they different?
    Kvale, Paul A.
    Johnson, Christine Cole
    Tammemagi, Martin
    Marcus, Pamela M.
    Zylak, Carl J.
    Spizarny, David L.
    Hocking, William
    Oken, Martin
    Commins, John
    Ragard, Lawrence
    Hu, Ping
    Berg, Christine
    Prorok, Philip
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2014, 86 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [10] Understanding diagnosis of lung cancer in primary care: qualitative synthesis of significant event audit reports
    Mitchell, Elizabeth D.
    Rubin, Greg
    Macleod, Una
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (606) : e37 - e46