Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review

被引:133
作者
Gardezi, Syed Jamal Safdar [1 ]
Elazab, Ahmed [1 ]
Lei, Baiying [1 ]
Wang, Tianfu [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Natl Reg Key Technol Engn Lab Med Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Lab Biomed Measurements & Ultrasoun, Sch Biomed Engn,Hlth Sci Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
breast cancer; lesion classification; malignant tumor; machine learning; convolutional neural networks; deep learning; PECTORAL MUSCLE SEGMENTATION; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; DENSITY-MEASUREMENTS; MASS CLASSIFICATION; TEXTURE; ENSEMBLE; GRADIENT; TRENDS;
D O I
10.2196/14464
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Machine learning (ML) has become a vital part of medical imaging research. ML methods have evolved over the years from manual seeded inputs to automatic initializations. The advancements in the field of ML have led to more intelligent and self-reliant computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems, as the learning ability of ML methods has been constantly improving. More and more automated methods are emerging with deep feature learning and representations. Recent advancements of ML with deeper and extensive representation approaches, commonly known as deep learning (DL) approaches, have made a very significant impact on improving the diagnostics capabilities of the CAD systems. Objective: This review aimed to survey both traditional ML and DL literature with particular application for breast cancer diagnosis. The review also provided a brief insight into some well-known DL networks. Methods: In this paper, we present an overview of ML and DL techniques with particular application for breast cancer. Specifically, we search the PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Web of Science databases and retrieve the studies in DL for the past 5 years that have used multiview mammogram datasets. Results: The analysis of traditional ML reveals the limited usage of the methods, whereas the DL methods have great potential for implementation in clinical analysis and improve the diagnostic capability of existing CAD systems. Conclusions: From the literature, it can be found that heterogeneous breast densities make masses more challenging to detect and classify compared with calcifications. The traditional ML methods present confined approaches limited to either particular density type or datasets. Although the DL methods show promising improvements in breast cancer diagnosis, there are still issues of data scarcity and computational cost, which have been overcome to a significant extent by applying data augmentation and improved computational power of DL algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Breast mass segmentation using region-based and edge-based methods in a 4-stage multiscale system [J].
Abbas, Qaisar ;
Celebi, M. Emre ;
Fondon Garciia, Irene .
BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2013, 8 (02) :204-214
[2]   Deep Learning to Distinguish Recalled but Benign Mammography Images in Breast Cancer Screening [J].
Aboutalib, Sarah S. ;
Mohamed, Aly A. ;
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Zuley, Margarita L. ;
Sumkin, Jules H. ;
Wu, Shandong .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (23) :5902-5909
[3]   A Novel Deep Learning-based Approach to High Accuracy Breast Density Estimation in Digital Mammography [J].
Ahn, Chul Kyun ;
Heo, Changyong ;
Jin, Heongmin ;
Kim, Jong Hyo .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2017, 10134
[4]   Breast Tissue Organisation and its Association with Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Ali, Maya Alsheh ;
Czene, Kamila ;
Eriksson, Louise ;
Hall, Per ;
Humphreys, Keith .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, USING DEEP CONVOLUTI
[6]  
[Anonymous], PROC CVPR IEEE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, VERY DEEP CONVOLUTIO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, COMMUN ACM, DOI DOI 10.1145/3065386
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CLASSIFYING MAMMOGRA
[10]  
[Anonymous], GUIDE MAMMOGRAPHY OT