Significance of R1 Resection for Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Effective Chemotherapy

被引:40
作者
Laurent, Christophe [1 ,2 ]
Adam, Jean-Philippe [1 ,2 ]
Denost, Quentin [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Denis [1 ,3 ]
Saric, Jean [1 ,2 ]
Chiche, Laurence [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux Segalen, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[2] St Andre Hosp, CHU Bordeaux, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, 1 Rue Jean Burguet, F-33075 Bordeaux, France
[3] St Andre Hosp, CHU Bordeaux, Dept Digest Oncol, F-33075 Bordeaux, France
[4] Haut Leveque Hosp, CHU Bordeaux, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, F-33600 Pessac, France
关键词
LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; PROGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS; HEPATIC RESECTION; PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA METASTASES; 5-YEAR SURVIVAL; CANCER; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-016-3404-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The prognosis impact of positive margins after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in patients treated with modern effective chemotherapy has not been elucidated. The objective was to compare oncologic outcomes after R0 and R1 resections in the era of modern effective chemotherapy. Between 1999 and 2010, all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for CLM were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with extrahepatic metastases, macroscopic residual tumor, treated with combined radiofrequency, or not treated with chemotherapy were excluded. Survival and recurrence after R0 (tumor-free margin > 0 mm) and R1 resections were analyzed. Among 466 patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, 191 were eligible. Of them, 164 (86 %) received preoperative chemotherapy and 105 (55 %) received postoperative chemotherapy. R1 resection (10 %) was comparable in patients treated or not by preoperative chemotherapy. R1 status was associated with more intrahepatic recurrences. Overall survival (OS) (44 vs. 61 %; p = 0.047) and disease-free survival (DFS) (8 vs. 26 %; p = 0.082) were lower in patients after R1 compared to R0 resection (32 months of median follow-up). Preoperative chemotherapy and major hepatectomy were prognostic factors of survival, whereas postoperative chemotherapy was a protective factor from recurrences. In patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy, OS and DFS were similar between R1 and R0 resections (40 vs. 55 %, p = 0.104 and 9 vs. 22 %, p = 0.174, respectively). In the era of modern effective chemotherapy, R1 resection leads to more intrahepatic recurrences but did not affect OS in selected patient responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative chemotherapy protects from recurrences whatever the margin resection status.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1199
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Colorectal liver metastases contract centripetally with a response to chemotherapy - A histomorphologic study
    Ng, Jennica K. S.
    Urbanski, Stefan J.
    Mangat, Naurang
    Mckay, Andrew
    Sutherland, Francis R.
    Dixon, Elijah
    Dowden, Scot
    Ernst, Scoff
    Bathe, Oliver F.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 112 (02) : 362 - 371
  • [22] Survival Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Following Hepatic Resection or Ablation in the Era of Effective Chemotherapy
    Nikfarjam, Mehrdad
    Shereef, Serene
    Kimchi, Eric T.
    Gusani, Niraj J.
    Jiang, Yixing
    Avella, Diego M.
    Mahraj, Rickhesvar P.
    Staveley-O'Carroll, Kevin F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (07) : 1860 - 1867
  • [23] Nordlinger B, 1996, CANCER, V77, P1254, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960401)77:7<1254::AID-CNCR5>3.3.CO
  • [24] 2-R
  • [25] Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial
    Nordlinger, Bernard
    Sorbye, Halfdan
    Glimelius, Bengt
    Poston, Graeme J.
    Schlag, Peter M.
    Rougier, Philippe
    Bechstein, Wolf O.
    Primrose, John N.
    Euan, T. Walpole
    Finch-Jones, Meg
    Jaeck, Daniel
    Mirza, Darius
    Parks, Rowan W.
    Collette, Laurence
    Praet, Michel
    Bethe, Ullrich
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    Scheithauer, Werner
    Gruenberger, Thomas
    [J]. LANCET, 2008, 371 (9617) : 1007 - 1016
  • [26] Influence of surgical margin on type of recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases: a single-center experience
    Nuzzo, Gennaro
    Giuliante, Felice
    Ardito, Francesco
    Vellone, Mairia
    Giovannini, Ivo
    Federico, Bruno
    Vecchio, Fabio M.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2008, 143 (03) : 384 - 393
  • [27] Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases
    Pawlik, TM
    Scoggins, CR
    Zorzi, D
    Abdalla, EK
    Andres, A
    Eng, C
    Curley, SA
    Loyer, EM
    Muratore, A
    Mentha, G
    Capussotti, L
    Vauthey, JN
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 241 (05) : 715 - 724
  • [28] Multicenter randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial
    Portier, Guillaume
    Elias, Dominique
    Bouche, Olivier
    Rougier, Philippe
    Bosset, Jean-Francois
    Saric, Jean
    Belghiti, Jacques
    Piedbois, Pascal
    Guimbaud, Rosine
    Nordlinger, Bernard
    Bugat, Roland
    Lazorthes, Franck
    Bedenne, Laurent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (31) : 4976 - 4982
  • [29] Hepatic resection for colorectal metastases: the impact of surgical margin status on outcome
    Poultsides, George A.
    Schulick, Richard D.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. HPB, 2010, 12 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [30] Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases: Is It Time to Reconsider Traditional Paradigms of Management?
    Reddy, Srinevas K.
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Clary, Bryan M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (09) : 2395 - 2410