Comparison of different iron oxide adsorbents for combined arsenic, vanadium and fluoride removal from drinking water

被引:16
作者
Chiavola, A. [1 ]
D'Amato, E. [1 ]
Boni, M. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Fac Civil & Ind Engn, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
关键词
Adsorption; Arsenic; Fluoride; Drinking water; Iron oxide; Vanadium; AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS; ADSORPTION; IONS; GROUNDWATER; DEFLUORIDATION; BREAKTHROUGH; EQUILIBRIUM; SORPTION; CADMIUM; BATCH;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-019-02316-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Contamination of groundwater by arsenic due to natural processes is rather common worldwide and hinders its use for drinking water supply. In many cases, arsenic contamination is found together with high levels of vanadium and fluoride. Therefore, more than one type of treatment is required to reduce concentrations of all these contaminants below non-hazardous levels so to make the source drinkable. The present study investigated the uptake capacity of arsenic, vanadium and fluoride by three iron-based adsorbent media differing for particle size, iron content and specific surface. The aim of the treatment was to achieve the maximum allowable concentration set on drinking water by the law. The removal efficiency was evaluated in single and binary contaminated solutions. All the tested adsorbents demonstrated an efficient and rapid removal process of both arsenic and vanadium in the single and binary solutions, with a higher adsorption capacity for vanadium; by contrast, they were unable to achieve an appreciable reduction in fluoride concentration. The particle size showed to have the highest effect on the removal rate. The best kinetic and isotherm models and the related parameters were determined for each condition. In the binary solutions, the presence of vanadium hindered the uptake of arsenic, whereas fluoride did not have any effect. The results obtained showed that the iron-based adsorbents tested in the present study can be successfully applied for the treatment of drinking water contaminated by arsenic and vanadium, whereas a different medium or process needs to be adopted for the removal of fluoride.
引用
收藏
页码:6053 / 6064
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Adsorption of fluoride ions onto carbonaceous materials [J].
Abe, I ;
Iwasaki, S ;
Tokimoto, T ;
Kawasaki, N ;
Nakamura, T ;
Tanada, S .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2004, 275 (01) :35-39
[2]   A bibliometric analysis of research on arsenic in drinking water during the 1992-2012 period: An outlook to treatment alternatives for arsenic removal [J].
Abejon, R. ;
Garea, A. .
JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2015, 6 :105-119
[3]   DEFLUORIDATION DURING DESALINATION OF BRACKISH WATER BY ELECTRODIALYSIS [J].
ADHIKARY, SK ;
TIPNIS, UK ;
HARKARE, WP ;
GOVINDAN, KP .
DESALINATION, 1989, 71 (03) :301-312
[4]  
[Anonymous], 52610111985 WRC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, COUNC DIR 98 83 EC 3
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
[8]  
ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2012, TOX PROF VAN
[9]   Kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of adsorption of arsenic onto granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) [J].
Banerjee, Kashi ;
Amy, Gary L. ;
Prevost, Michele ;
Nour, Shokoufeh ;
Jekel, Martin ;
Gallagher, Paul M. ;
Blumenschein, Charles D. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (13) :3371-3378
[10]   Ion Exchange Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated by Arsenic in the Presence of Sulphate. Breakthrough Experiments and Modeling [J].
Chiavola, Agostina ;
D'Amato, Emilio ;
Baciocchi, Renato .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2012, 223 (05) :2373-2386