Love cannot buy you money: Resource exchange on reward-based crowdfunding platforms

被引:18
作者
James, Tabitha L. [1 ]
Shen, Wenqi [1 ]
Townsend, David M. [2 ]
Junkunc, Marc [3 ]
Wallace, Linda [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Business Informat Technol, Pamplin Coll Business, 1007 Pamplin Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Management, Pamplin Coll Business, Blacksburg, VA USA
[3] Washington & Lee Univ, Williams Sch Commerce Econ & Polit, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Dept Accounting & Informat Syst, Pamplin Coll Business, Blacksburg, VA USA
关键词
economic exchange; Kickstarter; resource theory of social exchange; reward portfolios; reward‐ based crowdfunding; social exchange theory; EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; EARLY BIRDS; ONLINE; BACKERS; CROWD; INFORMATION; SUCCESS; CONSEQUENCES; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1111/isj.12321
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Reward-based crowdfunding platforms - in which campaigns exchange rewards for financial backing to develop a product or service - are one of the fastest-growing segments of the crowdfunding industry. We use an extension of social exchange theory (SET) called the resource theory of social exchange (RTSE) to examine resource exchanges through rewards on Kickstarter. A resource exchange occurs when a project backer and project creator exchange money (ie, financial backing) for a reward (eg, a thank you or a t-shirt). A project creator can develop a reward portfolio that contains various types of resources, which in the RTSE are categorised as love, status, information, money, goods and services. Our study provides a comprehensive examination of resource exchange on a major reward-based crowd funding platform, answering the call to investigate the effects of a key element of such platforms - rewards. We find that the types of resources project creators include in the reward portfolios they offer should be carefully considered. Specifically, our results indicate it is more beneficial to offer rewards that contain universal and concrete resources (eg, goods, services) than resources that are particularistic and symbolic (eg, love, status). However, the positive effect of offering universal and concrete resources as rewards is diminished as the fundraising goal is increased, which suggests that the optimal design of the reward portfolio is contingent on other characteristics of the campaign. Moreover, our findings reveal that while it is advantageous to offer more rewards, it is disadvantageous to offer too many different types of resources across those rewards. Overall, our study adds depth to the understanding of resource exchange in reward-based crowdfunding and provides practical insight into how to design reward portfolios.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 609
页数:31
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Of early birds and phantoms: how sold-out discounts impact entrepreneurial success in reward-based crowdfunding
    Adam, Martin
    Wessel, Michael
    Benlian, Alexander
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 13 (03) : 545 - 560
  • [2] Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance
    Allison, Thomas H.
    Davis, Blakley C.
    Webb, Justin W.
    Short, Jeremy C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2017, 32 (06) : 707 - 725
  • [3] The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance
    Anglin, Aaron H.
    Short, Jeremy C.
    Drover, Will
    Stevenson, Regan M.
    McKenny, Aaron F.
    Allison, Thomas H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2018, 33 (04) : 470 - 492
  • [4] Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd
    Belleflamme, Paul
    Lambert, Thomas
    Schwienbacher, Armin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2014, 29 (05) : 585 - 609
  • [5] The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding
    Bi, Sheng
    Liu, Zhiying
    Usman, Khalid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 71 : 10 - 18
  • [6] When consumers become project backers: The psychological consequences of participation in crowdfunding
    Bitterl, Sally
    Schreier, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2018, 35 (04) : 673 - 685
  • [7] Blau P. M, 1964, EXCHANGE POWER SOCIA
  • [8] Bretschneider U., 2014, 22 EUR C INF SYST AI
  • [9] Not just an ego-trip: Exploring backers' motivation for funding in incentive-based crowdfunding
    Bretschneider, Ulrich
    Leimeister, Jan Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 26 (04) : 246 - 260
  • [10] A RESOURCE EXCHANGE THEORY ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER-BEHAVIOR
    BRINBERG, D
    WOOD, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1983, 10 (03) : 330 - 338