Evaluation of freight villages: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis

被引:55
作者
Ozceylan, Eren [1 ]
Erbas, Mehmet [2 ]
Tolon, Mert [3 ]
Kabak, Mehmet [4 ]
Durgut, Temel [2 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-27310 Gaziantep, Turkey
[2] Turkish Mil Acad, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-06654 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Nisantasi Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-34380 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Gazi Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
ANP; Case study; Evaluation; Freight village; Geographic information system; TOPSIS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; SELECTION; TRANSPORTATION; LOGISTICS; COSTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.compind.2015.12.003
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The development of freight villages in a given region is often viewed as a popular project in the development of a particular country's logistic plans. However, the evaluation of a freight village location among the various alternatives is a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem including both quantitative and qualitative criteria. Obtaining relevant geographic data is another problem for the evaluation of freight village locations. In this study, a geographic information system (GIS)-based MCDM model is proposed to evaluate potential locations for freight villages. The proposed model consists of four sequential phases. In the first phase, different geographic criteria are determined from existing literature, and data are gathered using GIS. By criteria weights equally, alternative locations are determined through GIS in the second phase. In the third phase, identified criteria are weighted using analytical network process (ANP) method by various stakeholders of potential freight villages. In the fourth phase, the "Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)" method is applied in order to determine the best alternative based on the weighted criteria. Using real data from the city of Ankara, Turkey, we test the applicability of our evaluation approach and compare the best alternative obtained by the proposed method with the current freight village (CFV) location in Ankara. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 52
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]  
DAG S., 2013, J INT SCI PUBLICATIO, V7, P308
[12]   Exploring multi-criteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: an extension of the analytical network process using ordered weighted averaging operators [J].
Eldrandaly, Khalid A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2013, 27 (12) :2455-2482
[13]  
Hwang C-L., 1981, METHODS MULTIPLE ATT, P58, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93
[15]   A hybrid MCDM approach to assess the sustainability of students' preferences for university selection [J].
Kabak, Mehmet ;
Dagdeviren, Metin .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2014, 20 (03) :391-418
[16]   A conceptual model for intermodal freight logistics centre location decisions [J].
Kayikci, Yasanur .
6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CITY LOGISTICS, 2010, 2 (03) :6297-6311
[17]   The Role of Reverse Logistics in the Concept of Logistics Centers [J].
Kaynak, Ramazan ;
Kocoglu, Ipek ;
Akgun, Ali Ekber .
2ND WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 109 :438-442
[18]   The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems [J].
Kim, Nam Seok ;
Van Wee, Bert .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 19 (04) :859-875
[19]  
Konings J.W., 1996, TRANSPORT POLICY, V3, P3
[20]   Hinterland operations of sea ports do matter: Dry port usage effects on transportation costs and CO2 emissions [J].
Lattila, Lauri ;
Henttu, Ville ;
Hilmola, Olli-Pekka .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2013, 55 :23-42