Feasibility of quality-of-life research on the Internet: A follow-up study

被引:15
|
作者
Treadwell, JR
Soetikno, RM
Lenert, LA
机构
[1] San Diego Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, Sect Hlth Serv Res 111N1, La Jolla, CA 92161 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Biomed Eth, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Palo Alto Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Gastroenterol Sect, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
health status; Internet; quality-of-life; survey methods; World Wide Web;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008963516334
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Assessment of the feasibility of conducting clinical research with patients using electronic mail and the World Wide Web. Design: We re-contacted 463 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 154 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients who had provided us with email addresses as part of a Web-based study. In an electronic mail message, we informed patients of a web site with a new study and invited them to participate. We then examined the factors associated with patients' participation in the new study. Results: Completion rates were 28% for UC patients (single mailing) and 48% for BPH patients (up to four mailings in a two-month period). Some patients could not be contacted due to invalid email addresses (23%). Those who completed the new study tended to be older, and less time had elapsed since their participation in the previous study. Furthermore, their health-related quality-of-life had significantly improved since the previous study. Conclusion: It is possible to use direct electronic mail contact to conduct follow-up research with patients. Response rates appear to be related to the number of messages sent, age of the recipients, and time since the initial contact.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 747
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility of quality-of-life research on the Internet: A follow-up study
    Jonathan R. Treadwell
    Roy M. Soetikno
    Leslie A. Lenert
    Quality of Life Research, 1999, 8 : 743 - 747
  • [2] Feasibility of a trauma quality-of-life follow-up clinic
    Trevino, Colleen
    Geier, Timothy
    Timmer-Murillo, Sydney C.
    Shawlin, Matthew
    Milia, David J.
    Codner, Panna
    deRoon-Cassini, Terri
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2020, 89 (01) : 226 - 229
  • [3] Conservative Treatment of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Follow-Up Study on Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcome
    Godefroy, Willem P.
    Kaptein, Adrian A.
    Vogel, Justine J.
    van der Mey, Andel G. L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2009, 30 (07) : 968 - 974
  • [4] QUALITY-OF-LIFE - MEASUREMENT IN SURGICAL TUMOR FOLLOW-UP - METHODS, PROBLEMS, APPLICATIONS
    KOLLER, M
    KUSSMANN, J
    LORENZ, W
    ROTHMUND, M
    CHIRURG, 1994, 65 (04): : 333 - 339
  • [5] QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENTS IN PATIENTS WITH PEPTIC-ULCER DURING TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP
    GLISE, H
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 28 : 34 - 35
  • [6] The relation between clinical scores and quality-of-life in long-term follow-up
    Catarinella, Fabio S.
    Nieman, Fred H. M.
    Wittens, Cees H. A.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2016, 31 : 99 - 105
  • [7] QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PATIENTS TREATED FOR PENILE CANCER - A FOLLOW-UP-STUDY
    OPJORDSMOEN, S
    FOSSA, SD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 74 (05): : 652 - 657
  • [8] QUALITY-OF-LIFE AFTER KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION - A 10-22 YEARS FOLLOW-UP
    GORLEN, T
    EKEBERG, O
    ABDELNOOR, M
    ENGER, E
    AARSETH, HP
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1993, 27 (01): : 89 - 92
  • [9] Quality-of-life after total pancreatectomy: Is it really that bad on long-term follow-up?
    Brian J. Billings
    John D. Christein
    William S. Harmsen
    Jeffrey R. Harrington
    Suresh T. Chari
    Florencia G. Que
    Michael B. Farnell
    David M. Nagorney
    Michael G. Sarr
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2005, 9 : 1059 - 1067
  • [10] Quality-of-life after total pancreatectomy: Is it really that bad on long-term follow-up?
    Billings, BJ
    Christein, JD
    Harmsen, WS
    Harrington, JR
    Chari, ST
    Que, FG
    Farnell, MB
    Nagorney, DM
    Sarr, MG
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2005, 9 (08) : 1059 - 1066