Clinical utilization of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim) prophylaxis in breast cancer patients with adjuvant docetaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy

被引:2
|
作者
Jeon, Ye Won [1 ]
Lim, Seung Taek [1 ]
Gwak, Hongki [1 ]
Park, Seon Young [1 ]
Shin, Juhee [2 ]
Han, Hye Sug [2 ]
Suh, Young Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Surg, St Vincents Hosp, 93 Jungbu Daero, Suwon 16247, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Nursing, St Vincents Hosp, Suwon, South Korea
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Chemotherapy; Febrile neutropenia; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DOXORUBICIN; ANTHRACYCLINES; THERAPY; RISK;
D O I
10.4174/astr.2021.100.2.59
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Treatment with 4 cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in the adjuvant setting is associated with better outcomes than treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). However, Western guidelines have indicated that TC confers a high risk (>20%) of febrile neutropenia (FN), while AC confers an intermediate risk (10%-20%) of FN. Threrefore, we evaluated the incidence of FN and the clinical utilization of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis after adjuvant TC chemotherapy. Methods: We categorized 201 patients who received adjuvant TC chemotherapy into 3 groups according to the method of prophylaxis and compared neutropenic events, other adverse events, and hospital care costs in the 3 groups. Results: The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia decreased from 93.0% in patients without prophylaxis to 82.4% in those who received secondary prophylaxis and 16.7% in those who received primary prophylaxis. Although the incidence of FN was not different between patients without prophylaxis and patients who received secondary prophylaxis (15.7% and 14.9%), none of the patients who received primary prophylaxis developed FN. Moreover, a decrease in neutropenic events resulted in a significant decrease in the mean duration of neutropenia (2.50 days to 0.08 days, P < 0.001), the risk of hospitalization (29.8% to 2.2%, P < 0.001), and the mean total hospital care cost for all chemotherapy cycles (790.80 to 486.00 US dollars, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis during adjuvant TC chemotherapy is associated with significant decreases in the incidence of neutropenic events, hospitalization, and hospital care cost compared to those seen in patients without prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of colony-stimulating factors to reduce febrile neutropenic events in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy
    Alexandre Chan
    Wing Hang Fu
    Vivianne Shih
    Jurja Chua Coyuco
    Sze Huey Tan
    Raymond Ng
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011, 19 : 497 - 504
  • [42] Impact of an electronic tool in prescribing primary prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for breast cancer patients receiving TC chemotherapy
    Jeffrey Sulpher
    Pierre Giguere
    Sean Hopkins
    Susan Dent
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 3185 - 3189
  • [43] Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Utilization and Prescribing Patterns in Cancer Patients: A Single Institution Experience of a Saudi Cancer Center
    Alyamani, Mohammad J.
    AlSalloum, Haya
    Elgohary, Ghada
    Alsaleh, Khalid
    Warith, Ahmed Abd El
    Abd El-Aziz, Nashwa
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [44] Economic Evaluation of Intensive Chemotherapy With Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer in Japan
    Ishiguro, Hiroshi
    Kondo, Masahide
    Hoshi, Shu-Ling
    Takada, Masahiro
    Nakamura, Seigo
    Teramukai, Satoshi
    Yanagihara, Kazuhiro
    Toi, Masakazu
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (02) : 311 - 326
  • [45] Optimal use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis to improve survival in cancer patients receiving treatment
    Gascon, Pere
    Awada, Ahmad
    Karihtala, Peeter
    Lorenzen, Sylvie
    Minichsdorfer, Christoph
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2024, 136 (11-12) : 362 - 368
  • [46] Cost-Effectiveness of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer in the United Kingdom
    Whyte, Sophie
    Cooper, Katy L.
    Stevenson, Matt D.
    Madan, Jason
    Akehurst, Ron
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 465 - 474
  • [47] Comparison of the effects of pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on cytopenia induced by dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer patients
    Ashrafi, Farzaneh
    Salmasi, Mehrzad
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 23
  • [48] Efficacy, safety and proper dose analysis of PEGylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as support for dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in node positive Chinese breast cancer patients
    Zhang, Fan
    LingHu, RuiXia
    Zhan, XingYang
    Li, Ruisheng
    Feng, Fan
    Gao, Xudong
    Zhao, Lei
    Yang, Junlan
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (45) : 80020 - 80028
  • [49] Mobilization of dendritic cells in cancer patients treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and chemotherapy
    Radcliff, FJ
    Caruso, DA
    Koina, C
    Riordan, MJ
    Roberts, AW
    Tang, MLK
    Baum, CM
    Woulfe, SL
    Ashley, DM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2002, 119 (01) : 204 - 211
  • [50] Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study
    Florence Van Ryckeghem
    Chloë Haverbeke
    Wim Wynendaele
    Guy Jerusalem
    Luc Somers
    Anke Van den broeck
    Sofie Vingerhoedt
    Simon Van Belle
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 1099 - 1108