Clinical utilization of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim) prophylaxis in breast cancer patients with adjuvant docetaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy

被引:2
|
作者
Jeon, Ye Won [1 ]
Lim, Seung Taek [1 ]
Gwak, Hongki [1 ]
Park, Seon Young [1 ]
Shin, Juhee [2 ]
Han, Hye Sug [2 ]
Suh, Young Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Surg, St Vincents Hosp, 93 Jungbu Daero, Suwon 16247, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Nursing, St Vincents Hosp, Suwon, South Korea
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Chemotherapy; Febrile neutropenia; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DOXORUBICIN; ANTHRACYCLINES; THERAPY; RISK;
D O I
10.4174/astr.2021.100.2.59
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Treatment with 4 cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in the adjuvant setting is associated with better outcomes than treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). However, Western guidelines have indicated that TC confers a high risk (>20%) of febrile neutropenia (FN), while AC confers an intermediate risk (10%-20%) of FN. Threrefore, we evaluated the incidence of FN and the clinical utilization of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis after adjuvant TC chemotherapy. Methods: We categorized 201 patients who received adjuvant TC chemotherapy into 3 groups according to the method of prophylaxis and compared neutropenic events, other adverse events, and hospital care costs in the 3 groups. Results: The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia decreased from 93.0% in patients without prophylaxis to 82.4% in those who received secondary prophylaxis and 16.7% in those who received primary prophylaxis. Although the incidence of FN was not different between patients without prophylaxis and patients who received secondary prophylaxis (15.7% and 14.9%), none of the patients who received primary prophylaxis developed FN. Moreover, a decrease in neutropenic events resulted in a significant decrease in the mean duration of neutropenia (2.50 days to 0.08 days, P < 0.001), the risk of hospitalization (29.8% to 2.2%, P < 0.001), and the mean total hospital care cost for all chemotherapy cycles (790.80 to 486.00 US dollars, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis during adjuvant TC chemotherapy is associated with significant decreases in the incidence of neutropenic events, hospitalization, and hospital care cost compared to those seen in patients without prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with short- and long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors during treatment of solid tumours
    Kwinta, Lukasz
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 16 (01): : 9 - 13
  • [22] Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
    Skedgel, Chris
    Rayson, Daniel
    Younis, Tallal
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (01) : 387 - 394
  • [23] The Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor as Primary Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: An Experience of Moroccan Oncologists
    Kaakoua, Mohamed
    Boujmadi, Soukayna
    Belbaraka, Rhizlane
    Essadi, Ismail
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [24] Effects of primary granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis on neutropenic toxicity and chemotherapy dose delivery in Chinese patients with breast cancer who received adjuvant docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study
    Kwok, Carol C. H.
    Wong, W. H.
    Chan, Landon L.
    Wong, Sabrina P. Y.
    Wang, F.
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Tse, Shelly L. A.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (06) : 438 - 446
  • [25] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice
    Averin, Ahuva
    Silvia, Amanda
    Lamerato, Lois
    Richert-Boe, Kathryn
    Kaur, Manpreet
    Sundaresan, Devi
    Shah, Neel
    Hatfield, Mark
    Lawrence, Tatiana
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Weycker, Derek
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (04) : 2179 - 2186
  • [26] Impact of colony-stimulating factors to reduce febrile neutropenic events in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy
    Chan, Alexandre
    Fu, Wing Hang
    Shih, Vivianne
    Coyuco, Jurja Chua
    Tan, Sze Huey
    Ng, Raymond
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2011, 19 (04) : 497 - 504
  • [27] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice
    Ahuva Averin
    Amanda Silvia
    Lois Lamerato
    Kathryn Richert-Boe
    Manpreet Kaur
    Devi Sundaresan
    Neel Shah
    Mark Hatfield
    Tatiana Lawrence
    Gary H. Lyman
    Derek Weycker
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 2179 - 2186
  • [28] The prophylactic effects of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in newly diagnosed patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a randomised controlled study
    Li, Lei
    Ma, Shuiqing
    Wu, Ming
    Tan, Xianjie
    Zhong, Sen
    Lang, Jinghe
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 9 (04) : 373 - 380
  • [29] Impact of an electronic tool in prescribing primary prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for breast cancer patients receiving TC chemotherapy
    Sulpher, Jeffrey
    Giguere, Pierre
    Hopkins, Sean
    Dent, Susan
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (07) : 3185 - 3189
  • [30] Long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor pegfilgrastim (lipegfilgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation
    Danylesko, Ivetta
    Sareli, Rina
    Varda-Bloom, Nira
    Yerushalmi, Ronit
    Shem-Tov, Noga
    Magen, Hila
    Shimoni, Avichai
    Nagler, Arnon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 114 (03) : 363 - 372