Clinical utilization of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim) prophylaxis in breast cancer patients with adjuvant docetaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy

被引:2
|
作者
Jeon, Ye Won [1 ]
Lim, Seung Taek [1 ]
Gwak, Hongki [1 ]
Park, Seon Young [1 ]
Shin, Juhee [2 ]
Han, Hye Sug [2 ]
Suh, Young Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Surg, St Vincents Hosp, 93 Jungbu Daero, Suwon 16247, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Nursing, St Vincents Hosp, Suwon, South Korea
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Chemotherapy; Febrile neutropenia; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DOXORUBICIN; ANTHRACYCLINES; THERAPY; RISK;
D O I
10.4174/astr.2021.100.2.59
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Treatment with 4 cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in the adjuvant setting is associated with better outcomes than treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). However, Western guidelines have indicated that TC confers a high risk (>20%) of febrile neutropenia (FN), while AC confers an intermediate risk (10%-20%) of FN. Threrefore, we evaluated the incidence of FN and the clinical utilization of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis after adjuvant TC chemotherapy. Methods: We categorized 201 patients who received adjuvant TC chemotherapy into 3 groups according to the method of prophylaxis and compared neutropenic events, other adverse events, and hospital care costs in the 3 groups. Results: The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia decreased from 93.0% in patients without prophylaxis to 82.4% in those who received secondary prophylaxis and 16.7% in those who received primary prophylaxis. Although the incidence of FN was not different between patients without prophylaxis and patients who received secondary prophylaxis (15.7% and 14.9%), none of the patients who received primary prophylaxis developed FN. Moreover, a decrease in neutropenic events resulted in a significant decrease in the mean duration of neutropenia (2.50 days to 0.08 days, P < 0.001), the risk of hospitalization (29.8% to 2.2%, P < 0.001), and the mean total hospital care cost for all chemotherapy cycles (790.80 to 486.00 US dollars, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis during adjuvant TC chemotherapy is associated with significant decreases in the incidence of neutropenic events, hospitalization, and hospital care cost compared to those seen in patients without prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Febrile neutropenia and role of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Kimura, Yuri
    Sasada, Shinsuke
    Emi, Akiko
    Masumoto, Norio
    Kadoya, Takayuki
    Okada, Morihito
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (07) : 3507 - 3512
  • [2] How Safe Is the Administration of Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Cancer Patients?
    Geissler, Klaus
    Gunzer, Matthias
    Ostermann, Helmut
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 41 (05) : 316 - 326
  • [3] Design Rationale and Development Approach for Pegfilgrastim as a Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
    Arvedson, Tara
    O'Kelly, James
    Yang, Bing-Bing
    BIODRUGS, 2015, 29 (03) : 185 - 198
  • [4] Design Rationale and Development Approach for Pegfilgrastim as a Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
    Tara Arvedson
    James O’Kelly
    Bing-Bing Yang
    BioDrugs, 2015, 29 : 185 - 198
  • [5] Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in epirubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for Japanese breast cancer patients: a retrospective study
    Sakurada, Takumi
    Bando, Sanako
    Zamami, Yoshito
    Takechi, Kenshi
    Chuma, Masayuki
    Goda, Mitsuhiro
    Kirino, Yasushi
    Nakamura, Toshimi
    Teraoka, Kazuhiko
    Morimoto, Masami
    Tangoku, Akira
    Ishizawa, Keisuke
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 84 (05) : 1107 - 1114
  • [6] Febrile neutropenia and role of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Yuri Kimura
    Shinsuke Sasada
    Akiko Emi
    Norio Masumoto
    Takayuki Kadoya
    Morihito Okada
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 3507 - 3512
  • [7] Patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Gawade, Prasad L.
    Li, Shuling
    Henry, David
    Smith, Nancy
    Belani, Rajesh
    Kelsh, Michael A.
    Bradbury, Brian D.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (09) : 4413 - 4424
  • [8] Long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in primary prophylaxis of early infection in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
    Ding, Xinjing
    Ding, Jianghua
    Gu, Hong
    Zhong, Chuanxiang
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (05) : 4049 - 4054
  • [9] Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (DC) with Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) on Days 8 & 12 in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis
    Yerushalmi, Rinat
    Goldvaser, Hadar
    Sulkes, Aaron
    Ben-Aharon, Irit
    Hendler, Daniel
    Neiman, Victoria
    Ciuraru, Noa Beatrice
    Bonilla, Luisa
    Amit, Limor
    Zer, Alona
    Granot, Tal
    Rizel, Shulamith
    Stemmer, Salomon M.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [10] Neutrophil Recovery in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Docetaxel-Containing Chemotherapy with and without Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Prophylaxis
    Aarts, Maureen J.
    Vriens, Birgit E.
    de Boer, Maaike
    Peters, Frank P.
    Mandigers, Caroline M.
    Dercksen, M. Wouter
    Stouthard, Jacqueline M.
    Tol, Jolien
    van Warmerdam, Laurence J.
    de Wouw, Agnes J. van
    Jacobs, Esther M.
    van der Rij, Carin C. D.
    Smilde, Tineke J.
    van der Velden, Annette W.
    Peer, Nelly
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
    ONCOLOGY, 2017, 93 (05) : 323 - 328