Internalism in the Epistemology of Testimony

被引：6

作者：

Wright, Stephen ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Oxford Univ Coll, High St, Oxford OX1 4BH, England

来源：

ERKENNTNIS | 2016年 / 81卷 / 01期

关键词：

JUSTIFICATION; KNOWLEDGE;

D O I：

10.1007/s10670-015-9729-y

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

This paper objects to internalist theories of justification from testimony on the grounds that they can't accommodate intuitions about a pair of cases. The pair of cases involved is a testimonial version of the cases involved in the New Evil Demon Argument. The role of New Evil Demon cases in motivating contemporary internalist theories of knowledge and justification notwithstanding, it is argued here that testimonial cases make an intuitive case against internalist theories of justification from testimony.

引用

页码：69 / 86

页数：18

共 40 条

[1]

Adler J. E., 2002, Belief's own ethics, DOI [10.1080/15665399.2003.10819759, DOI 10.1080/15665399.2003.10819759]

[2]

[Anonymous], 1975, IGNORANCE CASE SKEPT, DOI DOI 10.2307/2218871

[3]

[Anonymous], 2004, EVIDENTIALISM

[4]

[Anonymous], 2011, KNOWLEDGE ON TRUST

[5]

Bergmann Michael., 2006, Justification Without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism

[6]

Brueckner A., 2011, PHILOS PAPERS, V38, P13

[7] CONTENT PRESERVATION [J].

BURGE, T .

PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1993, 102 (04) :457-488

[8]

Coady C. A. J., 1992, TESTIMONY PHILOS STU

[9] TESTIMONY - A PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY - COADY,CAJ [J].

FRICKER, E .

MIND, 1995, 104 (414) :393-411

[10]

Fricker E., 2006, The Epistemology of Testimony, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0011, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199276011.003.0011]

← 1 2 3 4 →