Disaster safety assessment of primary healthcare facilities: a cross-sectional study in Kurdistan province of Iran

被引:10
作者
Yari, Arezoo [1 ]
Zarezadeh, Yadolah [1 ]
Fatemi, Farin [2 ]
Ardalan, Ali [3 ]
Vahedi, Siamak [4 ]
Yousefi-Khoshsabeghe, Homa [3 ]
Boubakran, Mohsen Soufi [5 ]
Bidarpoor, Farzam [1 ]
Motlagh, Mohamad Esmaeil [6 ]
机构
[1] Kurdistan Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Res Inst Hlth Dev, Sanandaj, Iran
[2] Semnan Univ Med Sci, Res Ctr Hlth Sci & Technol, Semnan, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Emergencies & Disasters, Tehran, Iran
[4] Kurdistan Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, Sanandaj, Iran
[5] Urmia Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Orumiyeh, Iran
[6] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Dept Pediat, Ahvaz, Iran
关键词
Primary healthcare facilities; Risk assessment; Safety assessment; PUBLIC-HEALTH; EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS; SIMULATION EXERCISES; RESILIENCE; HOSPITALS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12873-021-00417-3
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Kurdistan province of Iran is among disaster prone areas of the country. The Primary Health Care facilities in Iran deliver health services at all levels nationwide. Resiliency and flexibility of such facilities is important when a disaster occurs. Thus, evaluating functional, structural, and non-structural aspects of safety of such facilities is essential. Methods In this cross-sectional study, the instrument used to evaluate four sections of functional, structural, non-structural, and total safety of 805 healthcare facilities in Kurdistan Province was the safety evaluation checklist of primary healthcare centers, provided by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Each section scored from 0 to 100 points, and each section of the safety was classified to three safety classes according to their total score: low (<= 34.0), average (34.01-66.0) and high (> 66.0). Results The levels of functional, structural, non-structural and total safety were equal to 23.8, 20.2, 42.3 and 28.7, out of 100, respectively. Regarding the functional safety, rapid response team scored the highest, while financial affairs scored the lowest. Nevertheless, in structural and non-structural sections, the scores of different items were almost similar. Conclusions The results of the study revealed that safety score of primary healthcare facilities in general was unsatisfactory. Thus, promoting preparedness, resilience and continuity of service delivery of these facilities are essential to response to disasters and emergencies. The finding of this study could be beneficial for national and provincial decision-makers and policymakers in this regard.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Strengthening national health emergency and disaster management capacities and resilience of health systems
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Safe hospitals in emergencies and disasters
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, WORLD C DIS RED
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, RISK REDUCTION EMERG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DISASTER RISK MANAGE
[7]  
Ardalan, 2011, DISASTER RISK ASSESS
[8]  
Ardalan A., 2012, PLOS CURR-TREE LIFE, V16, P4
[9]  
Ardalan A., 2011, Hospital Journal, P9
[10]  
Ardalan A., 2013, PLOS CURR-TREE LIFE, V28, P5